The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EEG fingerprinting: Subject-specific signature based on the aperiodic component of power spectrum
Open accessAbstract
During the last few years, there has been growing interest in the effects induced by individual variability on activation patterns and brain connectivity. The practical implications of individual variability are of basic relevance for both group level and subject level studies. The Electroencephalogram (EEG), still represents one of the most used recording techniques to investigate a wide range of brain-related features. In this work, we aim to estimate the effect of individual variability on a set of very simple and easily interpretable features extracted from the EEG power spectra. In particular, in an identification scenario, we investigated how the aperiodic (1/f background) component of the EEG power spectra can accurately identify subjects from a large EEG dataset. The results of this study show that the aperiodic component of the EEG signal is characterized by strong subject-specific properties, that this feature is consistent across different experimental conditions (eyes-open and eyes-closed) and outperforms the canonically-defined frequency bands. These findings suggest that the simple features (slope and offset) extracted from the aperiodic component of the EEG signal are sensitive to individual traits and may help to characterize and make inferences at single subject-level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Segments of EEG from one subject are more similar to each other than to segments from different subjects (Demuru and Fraschini, 2020).”
From Data leakage in deep learning studies of translational EEG (2024) · cites this paper as Demuru and Fraschini, 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity
Finn, E. S., Shen, X., Scheinost, D., Rosenberg, M. D., Huang, J., Chun, M. M., Papademetris, X., & Constable, R. T. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4135 · Cited by 2,747
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Lopes da Silva, 2013, EEG and MEG: relevance to neuroscience, Neuron, 80, 1112, 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.017 · DOI · Paper page
- Chan, 2018, Challenges and future perspectives on electroencephalogram-based biometrics in person recognition, Front. Neuroinf., 12, 10.3389/fninf.2018.00066 · DOI
- Gui, 2019, A survey on brain biometrics, ACM Comput. Surv., 51, 10.1145/3230632 · DOI
- DelPozo-Banos, 2015, EEG biometric identification: a thorough exploration of the time-frequency domain, J. Neural. Eng., 12, 10.1088/1741-2560/12/5/056019 · DOI
- Rocca, 2014, Human brain distinctiveness based on EEG spectral coherence connectivity, IEEE (Inst. Electr. Electron. Eng.) Trans. Biomed. Eng., 61, 2406
- Barra, 2017, Fusion of physiological measures for multimodal biometric systems, Multimed. Tool. Appl., 76, 4835, 10.1007/s11042-016-3796-1 · DOI
- Crobe, 2016, Minimum spanning tree and k-core decomposition as measure of subject-specific EEG traits, Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express, 2, 10.1088/2057-1976/2/1/017001 · DOI
- Fraschini, 2015, An EEG-based biometric system using eigenvector centrality in resting state brain networks, IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 22, 666, 10.1109/LSP.2014.2367091 · DOI
- He, 2014, Scale-free brain activity: past, present, and future, Trends Cognit. Sci., 18, 480, 10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.003 · DOI
- Podvalny, 2015, A unifying principle underlying the extracellular field potential spectral responses in the human cortex, J. Neurophysiol., 114, 505, 10.1152/jn.00943.2014 · DOI
- Voytek, 2015, Age-related changes in 1/f neural electrophysiological noise, J. Neurosci., 35, 13257, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2332-14.2015 · DOI
- Manning, 2009, Broadband shifts in local field potential power spectra are correlated with single-neuron spiking in humans, J. Neurosci.: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 29, 13613, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2041-09.2009 · DOI · Paper page
- Peterson, 2018, 1/f neural noise is a better predictor of schizophrenia than neural oscillations, bioRxiv, 113449
- Robertson, 2019, EEG power spectral slope differs by ADHD status and stimulant medication exposure in early childhood, J. Neurophysiol., 122, 2427, 10.1152/jn.00388.2019 · DOI
- Veerakumar, 2019, Field potential 1/f activity in the subcallosal cingulate region as a candidate signal for monitoring deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression, J. Neurophysiol., 122, 1023, 10.1152/jn.00875.2018 · DOI · Paper page
- Schalk, 2004, BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system, IEEE (Inst. Electr. Electron. Eng.) Trans. Biomed. Eng., 51, 1034
- Goldberger Ary, 2000, Physio Bank, Physio Toolkit, and Physio Net, Circulation, 101, e215
- Fraschini, 2019, Robustness of functional connectivity metrics for EEG-based personal identification over task-induced intra-class and inter-class variations, Pattern Recogn. Lett., 125, 49, 10.1016/j.patrec.2019.03.025 · DOI
- Mognon, 2011, ADJUST: an automatic EEG artifact detector based on the joint use of spatial and temporal features, Psychophysiology, 48, 229, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01061.x · DOI
- Fraschini, 2016, The effect of epoch length on estimated EEG functional connectivity and brain network organisation, J. Neural. Eng., 13, 10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/036015 · DOI
- Delorme, 2004, EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis, J. Neurosci. Methods, 134, 9, 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · DOI · Paper page
- Miller, 2012, Human motor cortical activity is selectively phase-entrained on underlying rhythms, PLoS Comput. Biol., 8, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002655 · DOI
- Gao, 2017, Inferring synaptic excitation/inhibition balance from field potentials, Neuroimage, 158, 70, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.078 · DOI
- Demuru, 2017, Functional and effective whole brain connectivity using magnetoencephalography to identify monozygotic twin pairs, Sci. Rep., 7, 9685, 10.1038/s41598-017-10235-y · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Data leakage in deep learning studies of translational EEG
Brookshire, G., Kasper, J., Blauch, N. M., Wu, Y. C., Glatt, R., Merrill, D. A., Gerrol, S., Yoder, K. J., Quirk, C., & Lucero, C. (2024) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2024.1373515 · Cited by 103
“Segments of EEG from one subject are more similar to each other than to segments from different subjects (Demuru and Fraschini, 2020).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Demuru, M., & Fraschini, M.
- Affiliations
- Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (NL)
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Fraschini, Matteo
- Venue
- Computers in Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 120
- Pages
- 103748
- ISSN
- 0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3000818859
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 6.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Computers in Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Regione Autonoma della Sardegna
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- subject identification, aperiodic component, EEG spectral power, interindividual variability, eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Electroencephalography, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
