Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning?
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Metacognitive activities that regulate task performance are considered important to successful performance during collaboration.
“Metacognitive activities that regulate task performance (e.g., making plans, monitoring task progress, and evaluating plans or ideas) are, for example, considered important to successful performance during collaboration (Artzt and Armour-Thomas 1997;De Jong et al. 2005;Janssen et al. 2007;Slof et al. in press).”
From Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches (2010) · cites this paper as Janssen et al. 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 352
- Authors
- Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Janssen, Jeroen
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1037-1065
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147954050
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 19.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dspace.library.uu.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Keywords
- computer-supported collaborative learning, equality of participation, collaborative learning environments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review