Cited by 352Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended LearningOnline Learning and Analytics

Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning?

Open access
Janssen, Jeroen, Erkens, Gijsbert, Kanselaar, Gellof, Jaspers, Jos·2007·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Metacognitive activities that regulate task performance are considered important to successful performance during collaboration.

    “Metacognitive activities that regulate task performance (e.g., making plans, monitoring task progress, and evaluating plans or ideas) are, for example, considered important to successful performance during collaboration (Artzt and Armour-Thomas 1997;De Jong et al. 2005;Janssen et al. 2007;Slof et al. in press).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 352

Authors
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Janssen, Jeroen
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
1037-1065
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147954050
Cited by
352
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
FWCI
19.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
computer-supported collaborative learning, equality of participation, collaborative learning environments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review