Turkish pre-service science and mathematics teachers’ computer related self-efficacies, attitudes, and the relationship between these variables
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These findings are in line with some previous studies that could not identify differences across gender.
“These findings are in line with some previous studies that could not identify differences across gender”
From Taking a future perspective by learning from the past – A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students' ICT literacy (2016) · cites this paper as Pamuk & Peker, 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Is there a gender gap? A meta-analysis of the gender differences in students' ICT literacy
Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2019) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.007 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2016) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.05.002 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Gender and socioeconomic related differences in performance based ICT competences
Aesaert, K., & van Braak, J. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.017 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pamuk, S., & Peker, D.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 454-461
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027464781
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 17.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- computer self-efficacy, attitudes toward computers, pre-service teachers, science teacher education, mathematics teacher education, gender differences, computer ownership, technology integration in teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
