A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The reliability and validity of enjoyment of learning and intention to learn are acceptable.
“Therefore, the reliability and validity of enjoyment of learning and intention to learn are acceptable, since all the values shown in Table 1 met the standard levels (Huang et al., 2012).”
From The effects of online peer-facilitated learning and distributed pair programming on students’ learning (2023) · cites this paper as Huang et al., 2012
The convergent validity and reliability of enjoyment of learning and intention to learn were verified with item loadings, AVE, CR, and Cronbach's alpha.
“We analyzed the data obtained in the post-test through the use of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and verified the convergent validity and reliability of the two variables of enjoyment of learning and intention to learn with Item Loadings, Average Variance Extracted (AVE), Composite Reliability (CR) and Cronbach ' s α (Huang et al., 2012).”
From The effects of online peer-facilitated learning and distributed pair programming on students’ learning (2023) · cites this paper as Huang et al., 2012
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Huang, Y.-M., Liang, T.-H., Su, Y.-N., & Chen, N.-S. (2012) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-012-9237-6 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Self-citationHsu, L. (2016) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2016.1278024 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Tsai, C.-W., Lin, M. Y.-C., Cheng, Y.-P., Lee, L.-Y., Chyr, W.-L., Lin, C.-H., Lin, J.-W., & Tsai, M.-C. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104849 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huang, Y.-M., Huang, Y.-M., Huang, S.-H., & Lin, Y.-T.
- Affiliations
- Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science (TW)
- National Cheng Kung University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Huang, Yueh-Min
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 273-282
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014332489
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 57.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- English vocabulary learning, ubiquitous learning, video-based learning materials, technology acceptance model, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, student attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
