CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 103Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsTeam Dynamics and PerformanceOnline and Blended Learning

The role of collective efficacy, cognitive quality, and task cohesion in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL)

Wang, Shu-Ling, Hwang, Gwo-Jen·2012·Computers & Education
DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-regulated students have greater motivation and control over their learning behaviors, and thus create better learning outcomes on the individual level, but especially as a team.

    “Indeed, self-regulated students have greater motivation and control over their learning behaviors, and thus create better learning outcomes on the individual level, but especially as a team (e.g., Wang and Hwang [64]).”

    From A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education (2022) · cites this paper as Wang and Hwang [64]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, S.-L., & Hwang, G.-J.
Affiliations
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
Corresponding author
Wang, Shu-Ling
ORCID
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
679-687
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.003
OpenAlex
W2031272656
Cited by
103
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
computer-supported collaborative learning, collective efficacy, task cohesion, cognitive quality, group performance, group process, prior performance, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review