Cited by 34Science Education and PedagogyEducational Methods and OutcomesTeaching and Learning Programming

Examining the effect of the computational models on learning performance, scientific reasoning, epistemic beliefs and argumentation: An implication for the STEM agenda

Psycharis, Sarantos·2013·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.015

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Simulation-based learning enables structured 'what-if' exploration and interpretation of outputs, but its learning value depends on whether assessment prompts require students to articulate governing principles and justify decisions rather than only operating the tool.

    “In classroom settings, SBL enables structured ‘what-if’ exploration and interpretation of outputs (e.g., trend plots and computed variables), but its learning value depends on whether assessment prompts require students to articulate governing principles and justify decisions rather than only operating the tool [21].”
  • Simulation-supported learning presents a risk that students may rely on simulator outputs without sufficiently articulating the governing principles, assumptions, and causal mechanisms underlying those outputs.

    “However, simulation-supported learning also presents a well-recognized risk: students may rely on simulator outputs without sufficiently articulating the governing principles, assumptions, and causal mechanisms underlying those outputs.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Psycharis, S.
Affiliations
School of Pedagogical and Technological Education (GR)
Corresponding author
Psycharis, Sarantos
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
68
Pages
253-265
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027915460
Cited by
34
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
Keywords
numerical experiments, mathematical modeling, inquiry-based science teaching, scientific reasoning, epistemological beliefs, argumentation, pre-service primary teachers, physics education, problem solving, argument-driven inquiry, STEM education, conceptual understanding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review