Doing what works: A grounded theory case study of technology use by teachers of English at a Korean university
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of technology-based systems exacerbates pre-existing pedagogical and infrastructure issues that limit their potential use.
“For example, whilst positive outcomes were reported generally, the study by Webster and Son (2015) shows that the use of technology-based systems exacerbates pre-existing pedagogical and infrastructure issues that limit their potential use.”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Webster and Son (2015)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 40
- Authors
- Webster, T. E., & Son, J.-B.
- Affiliations
- Ewha Womans University (KR)
- University of Southern Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Webster, Thomas E.
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 80
- Pages
- 84-94
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084415860
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 22.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
- Keywords
- educational technology use, English teachers, higher education, teacher decision-making, diffusion of innovations, technology integration in teaching, pedagogical issues, institutional infrastructure, Korean universities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
