CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 109

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Understanding new media literacy: The development of a measuring instrument

Lee, Ling, Chen, Der-Thanq, Li, Jen-Yi, Lin, Tzu-Bin·2015·Computers & Education
DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior assessment scales used in research have focused on digital competences, education specialists, or self-reporting of skills through Likert-type scales.

    “Since the assessment scales used in prior research have all focused on digital competences, education specialists or the self-reporting of skills through Likert-type scales (Chang et al., 2011;Eristi & Erdem, 2017;Lee, Chen, Li, & Lin, 2015;Literat, 2014), this instrument is an innovative one in the field of media and information literacy.”

    From Media and information literacy: a measurement instrument for adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as Lee, Chen, Li, & Lin, 2015

  • Some skills encompassed by digital, information and media literacy appear in all three areas: access, analysis, evaluation and generation skills.

    “some of the skills encompassed by digital, information and media literacy appear in all three areas.We are mainly referring to access, analysis, evaluation and generation skills.”

    From Media and information literacy: a measurement instrument for adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2015

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Aufderheide, 1997, Media literacy: from a report of the national leadership conference on media literacy, 79
  2. Baro, 2009, Information literacy among undergraduate students in Niger Delta University, The Electronic Library, 27, 659, 10.1108/02640470910979606 · DOI
  3. Berger, 2010, Media studies 2.0: a retrospective, Media Education Research Journal, 2, 5
  4. Brandtweiner, 2010, How to become a sophisticated user: a two-dimensional approach to e-literacy, New Media & Society, 12, 813, 10.1177/1461444809349577 · DOI
  5. Chang, 2008, Development and validation of the computer technology literacy self-assessment scale for Taiwanese elementary school students, Adolescence, 43, 623
  6. Chang, 2011, Exploring the media literacy of Taiwanese elementary school students, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20, 604
  7. Chang, 2011, Developing and validating a media literacy self-evaluation scale (MLSS) for elementary school students, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10, 63
  8. Chen, 2011, Unpacking new media literacy, Journal on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 9, 84
  9. Fabrigar, 2007, Likert scalling, vol. 2, 536
  10. Hargittai, 2005, Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy, Social Science Computer Review, 23, 371, 10.1177/0894439305275911 · DOI
  11. Hu, 1999, Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1, 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Lim, 2013, Singapore youth's new media participation: consuming, being, learning and schooling, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 727, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.270 · DOI
  13. Lim, 2008, Learning through 'prosuming': Insights from media literacy programmes in Asia, Science, Technology & Society, 13, 259, 10.1177/097172180801300205 · DOI
  14. Lin, 2013, Understanding new media literacy: an explorative theoretical framework, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16, 160
  15. Livingstone, 2010, Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers' use of the internet: the role of online skills and internet self-efficacy, New Media & Society, 12, 309, 10.1177/1461444809342697 · DOI
  16. Phang, 2009, Is ignorance bliss? Assessing singaporean media literacy awareness in the era of globalization, Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 64, 156, 10.1177/107769580906400203 · DOI
  17. Zillien, 2009, Digital distinction: status-specific types of internet usage, Social Science Quarterly, 90, 274, 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lee, L., Chen, D.-T., Li, J.-Y., & Lin, T.-B.
ORCID
Lin, Tzu-Bin
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
85
Pages
84-93
ISSN
0360-1315
DOI
10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.006
Cited by
109
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
National Institute Education Singapore (OER32/09 VC)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review