Cited by 151Online Learning and AnalyticsOnline and Blended LearningIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Learning analytics to support self-regulated learning in asynchronous online courses: A case study at a women's university in South Korea

Kim, Dongho, Yoon, Meehyun, Jo, Il-Hyun, Branch, Robert Maribe·2018·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 120 · Cited by 151

Authors
Kim, D., Yoon, M., Jo, I.-H., & Branch, R. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
Corresponding author
Jo, Il-Hyun
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
127
Pages
233-251
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888853498
Cited by
151
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
18.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015S1A5B6036244)
  • Ministry of Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
student self-regulation, asynchronous online courses, learning analytics, help-seeking, time management, K-medoids clustering, random forest, pedagogical support, female university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review