The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technology Enhanced Learning in higher education; motivations, engagement and academic achievement
Abstract
Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) has become a common feature of Higher Education. However, research has been hindered by a lack of differentiation between usage and engagement and not recognising the heterogeneity of TEL applications. The current study aimed to assess the impact of emotional, cognitive and behavioural engagement with TEL on students’ grades and to also look at how motivation levels differentially predict engagement across different types of TEL. In a sample of 524 undergraduate students, we measured engagement and usage of TEL, student learning motivations and self-report student grades. Our results indicate that intrinsic motivations predict engagement, whilst extrinsic motivations predict usage. Importantly, engagement was predictive of grades whereas usage was not. Furthermore, when TEL was broken down by type, the use of social media groups was a significant predictor of grade, whereas reviewing lecture slides/ recordings, reading additional content and using course blogs/ discussion boards were not. We conclude that a sole focus on usage of TEL is misleading. Implications for researchers and educators are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc-rcessc.v1i1.25 · Cited by 38,891
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,697
(1997) · Chemometrics in Environmental Analysis · doi:10.1002/352760216x.ch5 · Cited by 18,653
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581
Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling
Chin, W. W. (1998) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/290231.290235 · Cited by 4,577
Handbook of Research on Science Education
Abell, S. K. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203824696 · Cited by 4,447
Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12046 · Cited by 3,596
Self-citationComparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain.
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.99.3.432 · Cited by 3,129
Cited by
Mystakidis, S. (2022) · Encyclopedia · doi:10.3390/encyclopedia2010031 · Cited by 1,977
AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature
Kabudi, T., Pappas, I., & Olsen, D. H. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100017 · Cited by 734
Generative AI for Customizable Learning Experiences
Pesovski, I., Santos, R., Henriques, R., & Trajkovik, V. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16073034 · Cited by 274
“Over the past two decades, the use of digital tools in educational contexts has massively increased due to a multitude of factors that range from the greater availability of tools to the shifting expectations of the student population [30].”
BackgroundThe Impact of AI Usage on University Students’ Willingness for Autonomous Learning
Wang, L., & Li, W. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14100956 · Cited by 94
Bains, M., Kaliski, D. Z., & Goei, K. A. (2022) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00039.2021 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunn, T. J., & Kennedy, M.
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 137
- Pages
- 104-113
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2938441647
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 95.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technology Enhanced Learning in higher education; motivations, engagement and academic achievement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.004
- The paper
- Dunn, T. J., & Kennedy, M. (2019). Technology Enhanced Learning in higher education; motivations, engagement and academic achievement. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.