From design to reflection: Effects of peer-scoring and comments on students' behavioral patterns and learning outcomes in musical theater performance
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students expressed higher motivation when provided with the rating-plus-qualitative-feedback mode of peer feedback.
“some studies (Chen etal., 2020; Hsia etal., 2016) measured students' motivation with the ratingplus-qualitative-feedback mode of peer feedback and found that students expressed higher motivation when provided with this type of feedback.”
From Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature (2024) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2020
A researcher and the involved teacher coded the students' comments.
“A researcher and the involved teacher in this programming course were invited to code the students ' comments (Chen et al., 2020).”
From The effects of online peer-facilitated learning and distributed pair programming on students’ learning (2023) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2020
Cites
Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions
van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course
Tseng, S.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.007 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Panadero, E., & Alqassab, M. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Hovardas, T., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.019 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Hsia, L.-H., Huang, I., & Hwang, G.-J. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.004 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Self-citationGao, Y., Schunn, C. D. D., & Yu, Q. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1499075 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Ramon-Casas, M., Nuño, N., Pons, F., & Cunillera, T. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1525337 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Anker-Hansen, J., & Andrée, M. (2019) · Research in Science & Technological Education · doi:10.1080/02635143.2018.1557628 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guo, K., Pan, M., Li, Y., & Lai, C. (2024) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100962 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Self-citationOnline peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature
Kerman, N. T., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., Er, E., van Ginkel, S., & Noroozi, O. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12273-8 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
A systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors
Panadero, E., Alqassab, M., Fernández Ruiz, J., & Ocampo, J. C. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2164884 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
A systematic review of the key components of online peer feedback practices in higher education
Gao, X., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H. J. A., & Banihashem, S. K. (2024) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100588 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Tsai, C.-W., Lin, M. Y.-C., Cheng, Y.-P., Lee, L.-Y., Chyr, W.-L., Lin, C.-H., Lin, J.-W., & Tsai, M.-C. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104849 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“in this programming course were invited to code the students’ comments (Chen et al., 2020).”
- Authors
- Chen, I.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Lai, C.-L., & Wang, W.-C.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
- National Taipei University of Education (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Lai, Chiu-Lin
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 150
- Pages
- 103856
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3006921998
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 8.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Keywords
- peer assessment, student learning behavior, student motivation, online learning platforms, rubrics, feedback, performance-based assessment, higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
