Cited by 42Urban Design and Spatial AnalysisCrime Patterns and InterventionsEvacuation and Crowd Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An examination of the temporal effects of environmental cues on pedestrians’ feelings of safety

De Silva, C.S., Warusavitharana, E.J., Ratnayake, R.·2017·Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.03.006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Farrall, 1997, Questioning the measurement of the fear of crime: Findings from a major methodological study, British Journal of Criminology, 37, 657, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014203 · DOI
  2. Fisher, 1992, Fear of crime in relation to three exterior site features prospect, refuge ad escape, Environment and Behavior, 24, 35, 10.1177/0013916592241002 · DOI
  3. Foster, 2014, Do changes in residents' fear of crime impact their walking?, Preventive Medicine, 161, 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.02.011 · DOI
  4. Garafalo, 1981, The fear of crime: Causes and consequences, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72, 839, 10.2307/1143018 · DOI
  5. Giles-Corti, 2005, Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 169, 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018 · DOI
  6. Herzog, 1998, The role of mystery in perceived danger and environmental preference, Environment and Behavior, 30, 429, 10.1177/001391659803000401 · DOI
  7. Hijazi, 2016, Geostatistical analysis for the study of relationships between the emotional responses of urban walkers to urban spaces, International Journal of E-Planning Research, 5, 10.4018/IJEPR.2016010101 · DOI
  8. Keane, 1998, Evaluating the influence of fear of crime as an environmental mobility restriction on women's routine activities, Environment and Behavior, 30, 60, 10.1177/0013916598301003 · DOI
  9. Loewen, 1993, Perceived safety from crime in the urban environment, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 323, 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80254-3 · DOI
  10. Maslow, 1943, A Theory of Human Motivation, 50 (4), 430
  11. Nasar, 1983, Adult viewer preferences in residential scenes: A study of the relationship of environmental attributes to preference, Environment and Behavior, 15, 589, 10.1177/0013916583155003 · DOI
  12. Nasar, 1993, “Hot spots” of fear and crime: A multi-method investigation, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 187, 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80173-2 · DOI
  13. Nasar, 1997, Landscape of fear and stress, Environment and Behavior, 29, 291, 10.1177/001391659702900301 · DOI
  14. Perkins, 1992, The physical environment of street blocks and residential perceptions of crime and disorder: Implications for theory and measurement, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 21, 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80294-4 · DOI
  15. Ratnayake, 2013, Fear of crime in urban settings: Influence of environmental features, presence of people and social variables, Bhumi: The Planning Research Journal, 6, 25
  16. Ratnayake, 2017, Sense of safety in public spaces: University student safety experiences in an Australian regional city, Rural Society, 10.1080/10371656.2017.1284616 · DOI
  17. Riger, 1985, Crime as an environmental stressor, Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 270, 10.1002/1520-6629(198507)13:3<270::AID-JCOP2290130304>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI
  18. Riger, 1981, The fear of rape: A study in social control, Journal of Social Issues, 37, 71, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb01071.x · DOI
  19. Roe, 2013, Engaging the brain: The impact of natural versus urban scenes using novel EEG methods in an experimental setting, Environmental Sciences, 1, 93, 10.12988/es.2013.3109 · DOI
  20. Ross, 1993, Fear of victimization and health, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 159, 10.1007/BF01071166 · DOI
  21. Salesses, 2013, The collaborative image of the city: Mapping the inequality of urban perception, PloS One, 8, e68400, 10.1371/journal.pone.0068400 · DOI
  22. Sayin, 2015, “Sound and safe”: The effect of ambient sound of the perceived safety of public spaces, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.06.002 · DOI
  23. Schroeder, 1983, Perception of personal safety in urban recreation sites, Journal of Leisure Research, 16, 177
  24. Taylor, 1989, Toward an environmental psychology of disorder: Deliquecy, crime and fear of crime, Vol. 2, 951
  25. Taylor, 1985, Neighborhood-level links between physical features and local sentiments: Deterioration, fear of crime and confidence, Journal of Architecture and Planning Research, 2, 261
  26. Warr, 1990, Dangerous situations: Social context and fear of victimization, Social Forces, 68, 891, 10.2307/2579359 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
De Silva, C. S., Warusavitharana, E. J., & Ratnayake, R.
Affiliations
University of Moratuwa (LK)
Venue
Computers, Environment and Urban Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
64
Pages
266-274
ISSN
0198-9715 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2603659376
Cited by
42
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers Environment and Urban Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Keywords
perceived safety, environmental cues, pedestrian behavior, arousal, walking speed, low-cost sensors, university students, urban planning, affective reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review