The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855
Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3997 · Cited by 9,014
On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking
Yager, R. R. (1988) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.87068 · Cited by 7,289
From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020 · Cited by 6,341
Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.323 · Cited by 4,029
Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process
Saaty, T. L. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,356
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.01.005 · Cited by 2,761
Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance?
Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570510613956 · Cited by 2,453
Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000) · Applied Optimization · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6 · Cited by 2,394
Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review
Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009 · Cited by 2,184
Cited by
Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Jafarian, A. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014 · Cited by 1,040
Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method
Memari, A., Dargi, A., Akbari Jokar, M. R., Ahmad, R., & Abdul Rahim, A. R. (2019) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.002 · Cited by 555
Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach
Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., & Gold, S. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013 · Cited by 544
Zimmer, K., Fröhling, M., & Schultmann, F. (2016) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340 · Cited by 445
Supplier selection in resilient supply chains: a grey relational analysis approach
Rajesh, R., & Ravi, V. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.054 · Cited by 443
Metadata
- Authors
- Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G.
- Venue
- Computers in Industry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 164-174
- ISSN
- 0166-3615 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035854859
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 19.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compind.2010.10.009
- The paper
- Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2011). A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Computers in Industry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2010.10.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
