Cited by 377Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Mixed supervision for surface-defect detection: From weakly to fully supervised learning

Open access
Božič, Jakob, Tabernik, Domen, Skočaj, Danijel·2021·Computers in Industry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compind.2021.103459

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Božić et al. find that a small number of pixel-level annotations can help the model achieve performance comparable to full supervision.

    “Bo ž i č et al. [120] find that a small number of pixel-level annotations can help the model achieve performance comparable to full supervision.”

    From Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [120]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 377

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, and M. Mirza. Genera- tive Adversarial Networks. In Neural Information Process- ing Systems, pages 1-9, 2014. 3
  2. Y. Huang, C. Qiu, X. Wang, S. Wang, and K. Yuan. A com- pact convolutional neural network for surface defect inspec- tion. Sensors, 20(7), 2020. 2, 3, 7
  3. D. Pathak, P. Krähenbühl, and T. Darrell. Constrained Con- volutional Neural Networks for Weakly Supervised Segmen- tation Multi-class Image Segmentation. In International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1-28, 2015. 3
  4. D. Tabernik, S. Šela, J. Skvarč, and D. Skočaj. Segmentation-based deep-learning approach for surface- defect detection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, pages 1-18, 2019. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7
  5. R. Zhang, P. Isola, and A. A. Efros. Split-Brain Autoen- coders: Unsupervised Learning by Cross-Channel Predic- tion. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 645-654, 07 2017. 3

Authors
Božič, J., Tabernik, D., & Skočaj, D.
Affiliations
University of Ljubljana (SI)
Corresponding author
Božič, Jakob
Venue
Computers in Industry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
129
Pages
103459
ISSN
0166-3615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3153381206
Cited by
377
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 8
FWCI
25.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Industry (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
ARRS
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
surface defect detection, mixed supervision, weakly supervised learning, industrial inspection, defect segmentation, defect classification, image-level labels, annotation cost reduction, steel defect detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review