The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational pathology: Challenges and promises for tissue analysis
Open accessAbstract
The histological assessment of human tissue has emerged as the key challenge for detection and treatment of cancer. A plethora of different data sources ranging from tissue microarray data to gene expression, proteomics or metabolomics data provide a detailed overview of the health status of a patient. Medical doctors need to assess these information sources and they rely on data driven automatic analysis tools. Methods for classification, grouping and segmentation of heterogeneous data sources as well as regression of noisy dependencies and estimation of survival probabilities enter the processing workflow of a pathology diagnosis system at various stages. This paper reports on state-of-the-art of the design and effectiveness of computational pathology workflows and it discusses future research directions in this emergent field of medical informatics and diagnostic machine learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689 · cited 1×
“To measure the goodness of separation between two or more groups, the log-rank test (Mantel-Haenszel test) [84] is employed to assesses the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the survival experience of the individuals in the different groups.”
MethodWarfield, S. K., Zou, K. H., & Wells, W. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.828354 · Cited by 2,072
A method for normalizing histology slides for quantitative analysis
Macenko, M., Niethammer, M., Marron, J. S., Borland, D., Woosley, J. T., Guan, X., Schmitt, C., & Thomas, N. E. (2009) · 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro · doi:10.1109/isbi.2009.5193250 · Cited by 1,482
Spectral Imaging and Linear Unmixing in Light Microscopy
Zimmermann, T. (2005) · Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/b102216 · Cited by 302
Multiple Immunoenzyme Staining: Methods and Visualizations for the Observation With Spectral Imaging
Loos, C. M. V. D. (2008) · Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry · doi:10.1369/jhc.2007.950170 · Cited by 232
Cited by
Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images
Campanella, G., Hanna, M. G., Geneslaw, L., Miraflor, A., Werneck Krauss Silva, V., Busam, K. J., Brogi, E., Reuter, V. E., Klimstra, D. S., & Fuchs, T. J. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0508-1 · Cited by 2,799
Self-citationYu, K.-H., Zhang, C., Berry, G. J., Altman, R. B., Ré, C., Rubin, D. L., & Snyder, M. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12474 · Cited by 972
Deep learning in histopathology: the path to the clinic
van der Laak, J., Litjens, G., & Ciompi, F. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01343-4 · Cited by 902
A foundation model for clinical-grade computational pathology and rare cancers detection
Vorontsov, E., Bozkurt, A., Casson, A., Shaikovski, G., Zelechowski, M., Severson, K., Zimmermann, E., Hall, J., Tenenholtz, N., Fusi, N., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03141-0 · Cited by 572
Self-citationA Graph-Transformer for Whole Slide Image Classification
Zheng, Y., Gindra, R. H., Green, E. J., Burks, E. J., Betke, M., Beane, J. E., & Kolachalama, V. B. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2022.3176598 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuchs, T. J., & Buhmann, J. M.
- Venue
- Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 515-530
- ISSN
- 0730-4862 (ISSN-L)
- 0895-6111
- OpenAlex
- W2040414046
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
