Cited by 20

Computer-assisted subtyping and prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer patients with unresectable tumor

Saad, Maliazurina, Choi, Tae-Sun·2018·Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics

Abstract

Background The histological classification or subtyping of non-small cell lung cancer is essential for systematic therapy decisions. Differentiating between the two main subtypes of pulmonary adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma highlights the considerable differences that exist in the prognosis of patient outcomes. Physicians rely on a pathological analysis to reveal these phenotypic variations that requires invasive methods, such as biopsy and resection sample, but almost 70% of tumors are unresectable at the point of diagnosis. Method A computational method that fuses two frameworks of computerized subtyping and prognosis was proposed, and it was validated against publicly available dataset in The Cancer Imaging Archive that consisted of 82 curated patients with CT scans. The accuracy of the proposed method was compared with the gold standard of pathological analysis, as defined by theInternational Classification of Disease for Oncology (ICD-O). A series of survival outcome test cases were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and log-rank test (p-value) between the computational method and ICD-O. Results The computational method demonstrated high accuracy in subtyping (96.2%) and good consistency in the statistical significance of overall survival prediction for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients (p Conclusion The findings in this study support the idea that quantitative analysis is capable of representing tissue characteristics, as offered by…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.04.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Saad, M., & Choi, T.-S.
Venue
Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
67
Pages
1-8
ISSN
0895-6111
Cited by
20
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Korea Government (MSIP) (NRF-2015R1A2A2A01002734)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review