Cited by 99Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Insight in schizophrenia: a review of etiological models and supporting research

Osatuke, Katerine, Ciesla, Jeff, Kasckow, John W., Zisook, Sidney, Mohamed, Somaia·2008·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.08.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 99

Authors
Osatuke, K., Ciesla, J., Kasckow, J. W., Zisook, S., & Mohamed, S.
Affiliations
  • Cincinnati VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
70-77
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129009449
Cited by
99
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
insight, schizophrenia, psychosis, etiological models, anosognosia, psychodynamic theory
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Psychological, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review