Chemical treatment of wood fibers to enhance the sound absorption coefficient of flexible polyurethane composite foams
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chemical treatment changes the ratio between open and closed pores, thus improving the sound resistance ability of flexible polyurethane foams.
“They found out that chemical treatment changes the ratio between open and closed pores, thus improving the sound resistance ability of the obtained products.”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Augaitis, N., Vaitkus, S., Członka, S., & Kairytė, A. (2020) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma13235336 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Choe, H., Sung, G., & Kim, J. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Seoul (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Jung Hyeun
- ORCID
- Kim, Jung Hyeun
- Venue
- Composites Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 156
- Pages
- 19-27
- ISSN
- 0266-3538 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2779357099
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 5.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Composites Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-2017H1D8A1030582)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Foaming and Composites
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
- Keywords
- wood fibers, polyurethane foam, sound absorption coefficient, silane coupling agent, interfacial compatibility, effective porosity, flow resistivity, tortuosity, flexible foam
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
