CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 276High-Velocity Impact and Material BehaviorFluid Dynamics Simulations and InteractionsMechanical Behavior of Composites

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computational methods for bird strike simulations: A review

Heimbs, Sebastian·2011·Computers & Structures
DOI 10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.08.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.08.007

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 120 references

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. McCarty RE. Computer analysis of bird-resistant aircraft transparencies. In: Proceedings of the 17th annual SAFE symposium, Las Vegas, NV, December 2–6, 1979. pp. 93–7.
  2. Gong, 1992, Bird impact analysis of aircraft windshield transparency, Chin J Aeronaut, 5, 106
  3. McCarty RE. MAGNA computer simulation of bird impact on the TF-15 aircraft canopy. In: Morolo SA. editor. Proceedings of the 14th conference on aerospace transparent materials and enclosures, Scottsdale, AZ, July 11–14, 1983. pp. 974–1008.
  4. Faure JM. Airbus dynamic analysis experiences using Abaqus/Explicit. In: 2011 SIMULIA customer conference, Barcelona, Spain, May 17–19; 2011.
  5. John LK. Wing leading edge design with composites to meet bird strike requirements. In: Strong AB. editor. Composites in manufacturing – case studies, SME, Dearborn; 1991. pp. 3–18.
  6. Petrinic N, Duffin R. Discrete element modeling of soft body impact against rigid targets. In: 3rd B2000 users workshop, Enschede, The Netherlands, November 27–28; 2000.
  7. Wilbeck, 1978, Bird impact loading, Shock Vib Bullet, 48, 115
  8. Iannucci L. Bird strike on composite panels. In: DYNA3D user conference 1992. Manchester, UK, September 22–23, 1992.
  9. Guida M, Marulo F, Meo M, Riccio M, Russo S. Fiber metal laminate for bird impact conditions – numerical and experimental analysis. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on composite science and technology. ICCST/6, Durban, South Africa, January 22–24; 2007.
  10. Kamoulakos A. Bird impactor model. In: CRAHVI technical workshop, Bristol, UK, March 17; 2004.
  11. Nsiampa NN, Vandeveld T, Dyckmans G, Pirlot M. Numerical investigation of birdstrike dynamics on airplane structures. In: ISIE2010, 7th international symposium on impact engineering, Warsaw, Poland, July 4–7; 2010.
  12. Cheng J, Roberts GD, Binienda WK. Finite element simulation of soft projectiles impacting composite targets. In: 35th International SAMPE technical conference, Dayton, OH, September 28–October 2, 2003.
  13. Tischler J. Numerische Simulation des Vogelschlag-Impakts auf eine CFK-Flügelvorderkante mit Hilfe der Finite Elemente Methode, Diploma thesis, Universität der Bundeswehr München; 2003.
  14. Azevedo RL, Alves M. Numerical simulation of bird strike impact against balanced fiberglass/epoxy composite plates. In: Proceedings of the 19th international congress of mechanical engineering, Brasilia, Brazil, November 5–9; 2007.
  15. Engblom JJ. Coupled fluid/structure response predictions for soft body impact of airfoil configurations. In: Vinson JR, editor. Emerging technologies in aerospace structures design structural dynamics and materials. ASME Century 2 Publication; 1980, pp. 209–23.
  16. Nimmer RP. Nonlinear transient response of turbofan blades due to foreign object impact. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ADINA conference, Cambridge, MA, August 1; 1979.
  17. Zang, 2000, Bird impact dynamic response analysis for windshield, J Aeron Mater, 20, 41
  18. Samuelson A, Sörnäs L. Failure analysis of aircraft windshields subjected to bird impact. In: 15th ICAS Congress, London, UK, September 7–12, 1986. pp. 724–9.
  19. Zhang, 1991, A study of dynamic response for bird impact on arc windshields of aircrafts, Acta Aeron Astronaut Sinica, 12, B100
  20. McCarty RE. Aircraft transparency bird impact analysis using the MAGNA computer program. In: Conference and training workshop on wildlife hazards to aircraft, Charleston, SC, May 22–24; 1984. pp. 85–94.
  21. McCarty RE, Trudan DE, Davis AD. Nonlinear dynamic finite element analysis for the bird impact response of a preprototype T-38 aircraft windshield system. In: Proceedings of the 15th conference on aerospace transparent materials and enclosures, Monterey, CA, January 16–20, 1989. pp. 1447–85.
  22. McCarty RE, Landry P. Analytic assessment of bird impact resistant T-46A aircraft windshield system designs using MAGNA. In: Proceedings of the 15th conference on aerospace transparent materials and enclosures. Monterey, CA, January 16–20; 1989. pp. 1379–424.
  23. Edelstein KS, McCarty RE. Space shuttle orbiter windshield bird impact analysis. In: 16th ICAS Congress, Jerusalem, Israel, August 28–September 2; 1988. pp. 1267–74.
  24. Wen, 1990, The nonlinear dynamic response analysis of the front windshield of Y12 under bird-impact loads, Acta Aeron Astronaut Sinica, 11, A573
  25. West BS. Development of bird impact resistant crew enclosures for aircraft. In: Morton J. editor. Structural impact and crashworthiness, conference proceedings; 1984. pp. 696–709.
  26. Martinez F, Rico G, Franganillo A, Climent H. Bird impact on an aircraft leading edge. In: ABAQUS users’ conference, Paris, France, May 31–June 2; 1995.
  27. Hachenberg D, Graf O, Leopold T. Comparison of different approaches for bird strike simulation. In: 2nd EADS Workshop on crash and impact simulation, Ottobrunn, Germany, December 11; 2003.
  28. Lawson, 1987, Supercomputer simulation of a birdstrike on a turbofan aero engine, Finite Elem News, 3, 10
  29. Schuette W. Blade behavior during birdstrike. Science and engineering on supercomputers. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference, London, UK, October 22–24, 1990. pp. 145–57.
  30. Gong YN, Qian C. New model of bird impact response analysis and its engineering solution. In: Proceedings of the 18th ICAS congress, Beijing, China, September 20–25, 1992. pp. 1476–81.
  31. Wang, 1998, Finite element method numerical simulation of bird striking multilayer windshield, Acta Aeron Astronaut Sinica, 19, 446
  32. Strnad, 2009, Utilization of air gun and methods of structural test by flying object strike for test method simulation development, Czech Aerospace Proc, 1, 11
  33. Vasko TJ. Fan blade bird-strike analysis and design. In: 6th International LS-DYNA users conference, Dearborn, MI, April 9–11; 2000.
  34. Kari S, Gabrys J, Lincks D. Birdstrike analysis of radome and wing leading edge using LS-DYNA. In: 5th International LS-DYNA users conference, Southfield, MI, September 21–22; 1998.
  35. Furtado RD. Finite element analysis of birdstrike on aircraft structures. MSc thesis, Wichita State University, 2000.
  36. Kersten, 2002, Numerical bird strike simulation on aircraft structures, Vogel und Luftverkehr, 22, 5
  37. Kirtil E, Pestal D, Kollofrath A, Gänsicke N, Mendler J. Simulating the impact behavior of composite aircraft structures. In: ABAQUS users’ conference, Munich, Germany, June 4–6, 2003. pp. 287–301.
  38. Berry, 2007, Abaqus simulates, analyses composites for aerospace, JEC Compos, 32, 45
  39. Guida M, Grimaldi A, Marulo F, Meo M, Olivares G. Bird impact on leading edge wing with SPH formulation. In: 17th International conference on composite materials, ICCM-17, Edinburgh, UK, July 27–31; 2009.
  40. Smojver I, Ivancecic D. Numerical modeling of bird strike damage in airplane flap structure. In: 15th International conference on composite structures, ICCS-15, Porto, Portugal, June 15–17; 2009.
  41. Smojver I, Ivancevic D. Numerical modeling of impact damage in multi-material airplane structure. In: 17th International conference on composite materials, ICCM-17, Edinburgh, UK, July 27–31; 2009.
  42. McCallum SC, Constantinou C. The influence of bird-shape in bird-strike analysis. In: 5th European LS-DYNA users conference, Birmingham, UK, May 25–26; 2005.
  43. Xie, 1999, The FEM analysis and simulation of bird impact radome with composite sandwich structure, Explosion Shock Waves, 19, 235
  44. Hörmann M, Stelzmann U, McCarthy MA, Xiao JR. Horizontal tailplane subjected to impact loading. In: 8th International LS-DYNA users conference, Dearborn, MI, May 2–4; 2004.
  45. Shultz C, Peters J. Bird strike simulation using ANSYS LS/DYNA. In: 2002 ANSYS users conference. Pittsburgh, PA, April 22–24, 2002.
  46. Jain R, Ramachandra K. Bird impact analysis of pre-stressed fan blades using explicit finite element code. In: Proceedings of the international gas turbine congress, Tokyo, Japan, November 2–7; 2003.
  47. Frischbier, 2007, Bird strike – an impact load in the design of aero engines, Vogel und Luftverkehr, 27, 4
  48. Pei Y, Song B, Han Q. FEM analysis and simulation of bird striking aircraft structure. In: Progress on safety science and technology, Proceedings of the Asia Pacific symposium on safety, Shaoxing, China, November 2–4; 2005. pp. 379–84.
  49. Guimard JM, Heimbs S. Towards the industrial assessment of bird strike simulations on composite laminate structures. In: Composites 2011, 3rd ECCOMAS thematic conference on the mechanical response of composites. Hanover, Germany, September 21–23; 2011.
  50. Hiermaier S, Thoma K. Computational simulation of high velocity impact situations using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. In: 9th DYMAT technical conference, material and structural modeling in collision research, Munich, Germany, October 10–11; 1995.
  51. Kamoulakos A, Groenenboom P. Moving from FE to SPH for space debris impact simulations – experience with PAM-SHOCK. In: Proceedings European conference on spacecraft structures, materials and mechanical testing, Braunschweig, November 4–6; 1998.
  52. Machunze W. Numerische Analyse des Restenergie- und Restfestigkeitskriteriums für eine CFK-Slat nach Vogelschlag-Impakt, Diploma thesis, Technische Universität Dresden; 2005.
  53. Rössler C. Numerische Simulation des Vogelschlag-Impakts auf ein CFK-Flügelvorderkanten Konzept mit Hilfe der Finite-Elemente-Methode, Diploma thesis. Technische Universität München; 2004.
  54. Letellier A, Bung H, Galon P, Berthillier M. Bird impact on fan blade analysis using smooth particle hydrodynamics coupled with finite elements. In: ASME pressure vessels and piping division, symposium on structures under extreme loading conditions, vol. 351; 1997. pp. 191–5.
  55. Azevedo RL, Alves M. Numerical simulation of soft-body impact on GFRP laminate composites: mixed SPH-FE and pure SPH approaches. In: da Costa Mattos HS, Alves M, editors. Mechanics of solids in Brazil 2009, ABCM symposium series, Rio de Janeiro; 2009. pp. 15–30.
  56. Pilz, 2006, Developing military vehicles and aircraft, ANSYS Solutions, 7, 4
  57. Lavoie MA, Gakwaya A, Nejad Ensan M. Application of the SPH method for simulation of aerospace structures under impact loading. In: 10th international LS-DYNA users conference, Dearborn, MI, June 8–10, 2008.
  58. Johnson AF, Holzapfel M, Petrinic N. Modeling soft body impact on composite structures. In: European conference on computational mechanics, ECCM-2001, Cracow, Poland, June 26–29; 2001.
  59. McCarthy M. Bird impact on leading edge structures. In: CRAHVI technical workshop, Bristol, UK, March 17; 2004.
  60. Richter R. Validierung der Impakt-Resistenz einer CFK-Slat gegenüber Vogelschlag, Diploma thesis, Universität der Bundeswehr München; 2005.
  61. Roth YC. Composites in high lift applications for civil aircrafts: highlights in LuFo III, IVW-Kolloquium 2006, Kaiserslautern, Germany, November 14–15; 2006, pp. 71–85.
  62. Anghileri M, Castelletti LML, Molinelli D, Motta F. A strategy to design bird-proof spinners. In: 7th European LS-DYNA users conference, Salzburg, Austria, May 14–15; 2009.
  63. Selezneva M, Stone P, Moffat T, Behdinan K, Poon C. Modeling bird impact on a rotating fan: the influence of bird parameters. In: 11th International LS-DYNA users conference. Dearborn, MI, June 6–8; 2010.
  64. Bianchi F. Bird strike simulations with RADIOSS on AW helicopter blade and rotor controls. In: 3rd European hyperworks technology conference, EHTC2009, Ludwigsburg, Germany, November 2–4; 2009.
  65. Chuan KC. Finite element analysis of bird strikes on composite and glass panels. BSc thesis, National University of Singapore; 2006.
  66. Ryabov AA, Romanov VI, Kukanov SS, Shmotin YN, Chupin PV. Fan blade bird strike analysis using Lagrangian, SPH and ALE approaches. In: 6th European LS-DYNA users conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, May 29–30; 2007.
  67. Zhu, 2008, Study on bird shape sensitivity to dynamic response of bird strike on aircraft windshield, J Nanjing Univ Aeron Astronaut, 40, 551
  68. Zhu S, Tong M, Wang Y. Dynamic analysis of bird impact on aircraft windshield and bird shape sensitivity study. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on modeling and simulation, Nanjing, China, August 5–7; 2008. pp. 137–42.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Heimbs, S.
Corresponding author
Heimbs, Sebastian
ORCID
Heimbs, Sebastian
Venue
Computers & Structures
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
89
Issue
23-24
Pages
2093-2112
ISSN
0045-7949 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.08.007
OpenAlex
W2032868086
Cited by
276
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Computers & Structures (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Mechanical Behavior of Composites
Keywords
bird strikes, aircraft structures, Lagrangian simulation, Eulerian modeling, meshless particle method, impactor geometry, material models, structural damage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review