CXCL12/CXCR4 signalling in neuronal cell migration
Abstract
The chemokine CXCL12 (or SDF-1) and its receptor CXCR4 have originally been described as regulators of cell interactions in the immune system. However, over the past years it has become clear that this receptor/ligand pair is an important component of the machinery that controls cell migration in different regions of the developing nervous system. Here we will review some of these functions of the CXCL12/CXCR4 system, focusing on migration events in the cerebellum and the cortex. Furthermore, we will discuss these findings in light of the recently discovered second receptor for CXCL12, CXCR7, and the original functional properties of this molecule that have been described in zebrafish.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There was a strong physical interaction between CXCR4 and CXCL12 in the bioinformatic analysis.
“Compatible with prior work showing the integral biophysical and molecular relationships between the chemokine CXCL12 (SDF-1) and its receptor CXCR4 [30], we detected a strong physical interaction between CXCR4 and CXCL12 in our bioinformatic analysis.”
From Shared genetic risk between corticobasal degeneration, progressive supranuclear palsy, and frontotemporal dementia (2017) · cites this paper as [30]
Cites
Li, G., Adesnik, H., Li, J., Long, J., Nicoll, R. A., Rubenstein, J. L. R., & Pleasure, S. J. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4602-07.2008 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
International FTD-Genomics Consortium (IFGC), Yokoyama, J. S., Karch, C. M., Fan, C. C., Bonham, L. W., Kouri, N., Ross, O. A., Rademakers, R., Kim, J., Wang, Y., et al. (2017) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-017-1693-y · Cited by 99 · see citing works
“Compatible with prior work showing the integral biophysical and molecular relationships between the chemokine CXCL12 (SDF1) and its receptor CXCR4 [30], we detected a strong physical interaction between CXCR4 and CXCL12 in our bioinformatic analysis.”
Background
- Authors
- Tiveron, M.-C., & Cremer, H.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237-244
- ISSN
- 0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047770330
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL AMU (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
- Keywords
- CXCL12, CXCR4, CXCR7, chemokine signaling, neuronal migration, cerebellar development, cortical development, brain development, zebrafish
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Movement, Neurons, Signal Transduction, Receptors, CXCR4, Chemokine CXCL12
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review