Critical period for first language: the crucial role of language input during the first year of life
Abstract
The critical period for language acquisition is often explored in the context of second language acquisition. We focus on a crucially different notion of critical period for language, with a crucially different time scale: that of a critical period for first language acquisition. We approach this question by examining the language outcomes of children who missed their critical period for acquiring a first language: children who did not receive the required language input because they grew in isolation or due to hearing impairment and children whose brain has not developed normally because of thiamine deficiency. We find that the acquisition of syntax in a first language has a critical period that ends during the first year of life, and children who missed this window of opportunity later show severe syntactic impairments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Critical developmental windows exist for different brain regions, including those linked to high-order functions such as language and executive planning.
“These critical developmental windows exist for different brain regions, including those linked to high-order functions such as language and executive planning 18,19 (Figure 2).”
From Developmental timing and critical windows for the treatment of psychiatric disorders (2016) · cites this paper as [19]
Cites
Reactivation of Ocular Dominance Plasticity in the Adult Visual Cortex
Pizzorusso, T., Medini, P., Berardi, N., Chierzi, S., Fawcett, J. W., & Maffei, L. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1072699 · Cited by 1,679 · see citing works
Maturational constraints on language development.
Long, M. H. (1990) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100009165 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Critical periods in language acquisition and language attrition
Pallier, C. (2007) · Studies in Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.33.11pal · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cerebral plasticity: windows of opportunity in the developing brain
Ismail, F. Y., Fatemi, A., & Johnston, M. V. (2017) · European Journal of Paediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.07.007 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
Developmental timing and critical windows for the treatment of psychiatric disorders
Marín, O. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4225 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
- Authors
- Friedmann, N., & Rusou, D.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Friedmann, Naama
- ORCID
- Friedmann, Naama
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 35
- Pages
- 27-34
- ISSN
- 0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W779394199
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Israel Science Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
- Keywords
- critical period, first language acquisition, language input, first year of life, syntax acquisition, syntactic impairment, deaf children, thiamine deficiency, brain development, language deprivation
- MeSH terms
- Deafness, Humans, Infant, Language Development, Language Development Disorders, Thiamine Deficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review