Cited by 560Geotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchGeotechnical and construction materials studies

Experimental feasibility study of geopolymer as the next-generation soil stabilizer

Zhang, Mo, Guo, Hong, El-Korchi, Tahar, Zhang, Guoping, Tao, Mingjiang·2013·Construction and Building Materials

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.017

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, M., Guo, H., El-Korchi, T., Zhang, G., & Tao, M.
Affiliations
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Tao, Mingjiang
Venue
Construction and Building Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
47
Pages
1468-1478
ISSN
0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027737058
Cited by
560
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
25.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Construction and Building Materials (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
Keywords
geopolymer, soil stabilization, metakaolin, lean clay, compressive strength, shrinkage strain, CO2 emission reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review