Cited by 199Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchRecycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Stabilization of Recycled Demolition Aggregates by Geopolymers comprising Calcium Carbide Residue, Fly Ash and Slag precursors

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.150

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Oksri-Nelfia, 2015, Reuse of recycled crushed concrete fines as mineral addition in cementitious materials, Mater. Struct./Materiaux et Constr.
  2. Arulrajah, 2014, Physical properties and shear strength responses of recycled construction and demolition materials in unbound pavement base/subbase applications, Constr. Build. Mater., 58, 245, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.025 · DOI
  3. Serres, 2016, Environmental evaluation of concrete made from recycled concrete aggregate implementing life cycle assessment, J. Build. Eng., 5, 24, 10.1016/j.jobe.2015.11.004 · DOI
  4. Medina, 2015, Effect of the constituents (asphalt, clay materials, floating particles and fines) of construction and demolition waste on the properties of recycled concretes, Constr. Build. Mater., 79, 22, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.070 · DOI
  5. Tsoumani, 2015, Recycled aggregate as structural material, Waste Biomass Valorization, 6, 883, 10.1007/s12649-015-9385-0 · DOI
  6. Gómez-Meijide, 2015, Recycled construction and demolition waste in cold asphalt mixtures: evolutionary properties, J. Cleaner Prod., 112, 588, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.038 · DOI
  7. Arulrajah, 2013, Geotechnical performance of recycled glass-waste rock blends in footpath bases, J. Mater. Civil Eng., 25, 653, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000617 · DOI
  8. Arulrajah, 2015, Modulus of rupture evaluation of cement stabilized recycled glass/recycled concrete aggregate blends, Constr. Build. Mater., 84, 146, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.048 · DOI
  9. Snellings, 2012, Supplementary cementitious materials, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 74, 211, 10.2138/rmg.2012.74.6 · DOI
  10. Du, 2013, Engineering properties and microstructural characteristics of cement-stabilized zinc-contaminated kaolin, Can. Geotech. J., 51, 289, 10.1139/cgj-2013-0177 · DOI
  11. Horpibulsuk, 2014, Strength of sustainable non-bearing masonry units manufactured from calcium carbide residue and fly ash, Constr. Build. Mater., 71, 210, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.033 · DOI
  12. Hoyos, 2011, Characterization of cement fiber-treated reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates: preliminary investigation, J. Mater. Civil Eng. ASCE, 23, 977, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000267 · DOI
  13. Mohammadinia, 2016, Stabilization of demolition materials for pavement base/subbase applications using flyash and slag geopolymers: a laboratory investigation, J. Mater. Civil Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001526 · DOI
  14. Phetchuay, 2014, Calcium carbide residue: alkaline activator for clay–fly ash geopolymer, Constr. Build. Mater., 69, 285, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.018 · DOI
  15. Phummiphan, 2015, Stabilization of marginal lateritic soil using high calcium fly ash based geopolymer, Road Mater. Pavement Des., 210–5
  16. Horpibulsuk, 2012, Soil stabilization by calcium carbide residue and fly ash, J. Mater. Civil Eng., 24, 184, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000370 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Horpibulsuk, 2013, Strength development in silty clay stabilized with calcium carbide residue and fly ash, Soils Found., 53, 477, 10.1016/j.sandf.2013.06.001 · DOI
  18. Kampala, 2013, Engineering properties of silty clay stabilized with calcium carbide residue, J. Mater. Civil Eng., 25, 632, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000618 · DOI
  19. Davidovits, 1991, Geopolymers, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 37, 1633, 10.1007/BF01912193 · DOI
  20. Palomo, 1999, Alkali-activated fly ashes: a cement for the future, Cem. Concr. Res., 29, 1323, 10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00243-9 · DOI
  21. Duxson, 2005, 29Si NMR study of structural ordering in aluminosilicate geopolymer gels, Langmuir, 21, 3028, 10.1021/la047336x · DOI
  22. Criado, 2005, Alkali activation of fly ashes. Part 1: effect of curing conditions on the carbonation of the reaction products, Fuel, 84, 2048, 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.03.030 · DOI
  23. Nematollahi, 2014, Effect of different superplasticizers and activator combinations on workability and strength of fly ash based geopolymer, Mater. Des., 57, 667, 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.064 · DOI
  24. Arulrajah, 2013, Geotechnical and geoenvironmental properties of recycled construction and demolition materials in pavement subbase applications, J. Mater. Civil Eng., 25, 1077, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000652 · DOI
  25. ACI, 1990, State-of-the-art report on soil-cement, ACI Mater. J., 87
  26. Arulrajah, 2011, Geotechnical properties of recycled crushed brick in pavement applications, J. Mater. Civil Eng., 23, 1444, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000319 · DOI
  27. Puppala, 2011, Resilient moduli response of moderately cement-treated reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates, J. Mater. Civil Eng. ASCE, 23, 990, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000268 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Arulrajah, A., Mohammadinia, A., Phummiphan, I., Horpibulsuk, S., & Samingthong, W.
Affiliations
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • Suranaree University of Technology (TH)
Corresponding author
  • Arulrajah, Arul
  • Horpibulsuk, Suksun
Venue
Construction and Building Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
114
Pages
864-873
ISSN
0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2317118080
Cited by
199
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 7
FWCI
24.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Construction and Building Materials (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council’s Linkage Projects funding scheme (LP120100107)
  • Suranaree University of Technology – Thailand
  • Office of Higher Education Commission
  • Thailand Research Fund (RTA5680002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Keywords
calcium carbide residue, geopolymer stabilization, recycled concrete aggregate, crushed brick, construction and demolition waste, alkali activation, fly ash, slag, pavement base and subbase, unconfined compressive strength, resilient modulus, durability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review