The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoparticles as concrete additives: Review and perspectives
Abstract
Abstract Nanoparticles are highly efficient additives for modification of cement products, even at small concentrations (≤1%). The main modifications are (typical ranges shown, though great variability has been observed): reduction of set time (by 1–2 h) and diffusivity (by 4–75%), and increase of strength (by 5–25%), and thermal durability (0–30% increase in residual strength). These modifications were attributed to the unique reactivity of nanoparticles associated with their small size and large surface area. The paper reviews documented observations of SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, TiO2, CaCO3, and clay nanoparticles, and discusses effective modification mechanisms and commercial application challenges, including cost and dispersion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hydration and properties of nano-TiO2 blended cement composites
Chen, J., Kou, S.-C., & Poon, C.-S. (2012) · Cement and Concrete Composites · doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.02.009 · Cited by 518
Barkoula, N.-M., Ioannou, C., Aggelis, D. G., & Matikas, T. E. (2016) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.055 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Reches, Y.
- Venue
- Construction and Building Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 175
- Pages
- 483-495
- ISSN
- 0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2800507549
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
