Synaesthesia is associated with enhanced, self-rated visual imagery
Abstract
Although the condition known as synaesthesia is currently undergoing a scientific resurgence, to date the literature has largely focused on the heterogeneous nature of synaesthesia across individuals. In order to provide a better understanding of synaesthesia, however, general characteristics need to be investigated. Synaesthetic experiences are often described as occurring 'internally' or in the 'mind's eye', which is remarkably similar to how we would describe our experience of visual mental imagery. We assessed the role of visual imagery in synaesthesia by sampling a large group of synaesthetes and found that they report experiencing more vivid mental images than controls. These findings have important implications for our general understanding of synaesthesia and, in particular, emphasize the need to control for visual imagery in behavioural and neuroimaging paradigms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Average imagery vividness is increased in people with synaesthesia.
“consistent with the prior observation that average imagery vividness is increased in people with synaesthesia [69”
From Aphantasia and hyperphantasia: exploring imagery vividness extremes (2024) · cites this paper as [69]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 50 · Cited by 170
- Authors
- Barnett, K. J., & Newell, F. N.
- Affiliations
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Newell, Fiona N.
- Venue
- Consciousness and Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1032-1039
- ISSN
- 1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009228825
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
- Keywords
- synesthesia, visual imagery, imagery vividness, mind's eye, cross-modal correspondence
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cues, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Mental Processes, Psychomotor Performance, Self Concept, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review