Conscious emotional experience emerges as a function of multilevel, appraisal-driven response synchronization.
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we discuss the issue of the processes potentially underlying the emergence of emotional consciousness in the light of theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. First, we argue that componential emotion models, and specifically the Component Process Model (CPM), may be better able to account for the emergence of feelings than basic emotion or dimensional models. Second, we advance the hypothesis that consciousness of emotional reactions emerges when lower levels of processing are not sufficient to cope with the event and regulate the emotional process, particularly when the degree of synchronization between the components reaches a critical level and duration. Third, we review recent neuroscience evidence that bolsters our claim of the central importance of the synchronization of neuronal assemblies at different levels of processing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Emotional processes evaluate the relevance of events for the organism.
“emotional processes evaluate (appraise) the relevance of events (including internal events such as allostatic prediction error) for the organism.”
From Pain Asymbolia as Depersonalization for Pain Experience. An Interoceptive Active Inference Account (2020) · cites this paper as Grandjean et al., 2008
Emotional processes need to model the organism as an entity with goals realized or frustrated in action.
“they need to model the organism as an entity with goals realized or frustrated in action (including internal regulatory action)”
From Pain Asymbolia as Depersonalization for Pain Experience. An Interoceptive Active Inference Account (2020) · cites this paper as Grandjean et al., 2008
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 110 · Cited by 302
- Authors
- Grandjean, D., Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Grandjean, Didier
- Venue
- Consciousness and Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 484-495
- ISSN
- 1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119217515
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 110
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 14.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Keywords
- emotional awareness, Component Process Model, dimensional emotion models, appraisal, levels of processing, emotion regulation
- MeSH terms
- Consciousness, Emotions, Humans, Models, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review