The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion
Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415429a · Cited by 4,844
Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.87.6.532 · Cited by 3,023 · cited 1×
“Central to theories of associative learning is the role of surprise or prediction error (Mackintosh, 1975; Pearce & Hall, 1980; Rescorla & Wagner, 1972).”
A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement
Mackintosh, N. J. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0076778 · Cited by 2,733
LIBET, B., GLEASON, C. A., WRIGHT, E. W., & PEARL, D. K. (1983) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/106.3.623 · Cited by 2,498
Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates
Balleine, B. W., & Dickinson, A. (1998) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0028-3908(98)00033-1 · Cited by 1,541
The mind's best trick: how we experience conscious will
Wegner, D. M. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00002-0 · Cited by 561
Altered awareness of action in schizophrenia: a specific deficit in predicting action consequences
Voss, M., Moore, J., Hauser, M., Gallinat, J., Heinz, A., & Haggard, P. (2010) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awq152 · Cited by 366
Self-citationGlutamatergic model psychoses: prediction error, learning, and inference
Corlett, P. R., Honey, G. D., Krystal, J. H., & Fletcher, P. C. (2011) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2010.163 · Cited by 229
Cited by
Hypnosis and top-down regulation of consciousness
Terhune, D. B., Cleeremans, A., Raz, A., & Lynn, S. J. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.002 · Cited by 183
Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of functional (psychogenic) movement disorders
Baizabal-Carvallo, J. F., Hallett, M., & Jankovic, J. (2019) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2019.02.013 · Cited by 163
How does HCI Understand Human Agency and Autonomy?
Bennett, D., Metatla, O., Roudaut, A., & Mekler, E. D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580651 · Cited by 111
“correlate with the user’s implicit sense of having caused an action [121]).”
BackgroundTerhune, D. B., & Oakley, D. A. (2020) · The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination · doi:10.1017/9781108580298.043 · Cited by 72
Metacognition of intentions in mindfulness and hypnosis
Lush, P., Naish, P., & Dienes, Z. (2016) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niw007 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, J. W., & Obhi, S. S.
- Venue
- Consciousness and Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 546-561
- ISSN
- 1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057947947
- Cited by
- 563
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.002
- The paper
- Moore, J. W., & Obhi, S. S. (2012). Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review. Consciousness and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
