Mysticism and schizophrenia: a phenomenological exploration of the structure of consciousness in the schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
Open accessAbstract
• The paper is a clinical-phenomenological investigation of schizophrenic psychosis. • Mystical states, especially mystical union, are used for analogical exploration. • Structural similarities between schizophrenic and mystical experience are described. • Similarities comprise world-detachment, self-effacement, and revelation. • In schizophrenia, these experiences are facilitated by self-disorders. Mysticism and schizophrenia are different categories of human existence and experience. Nonetheless, they exhibit important phenomenological affinities, which, however, remain largely unaddressed. In this study, we explore structural analogies between key features of mysticism and major clinical-phenomenological aspects of the schizophrenia spectrum disorders—i.e. attitudes, the nature of experience, and the ‘other’, mystical or psychotic reality. Not only do these features gravitate around the issue of the basic dimensions of consciousness, they crucially seem to implicate and presuppose a specific alteration of the very structure of consciousness. This finding has bearings for the understanding of consciousness and its psychopathological distortions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior attempts to differentiate mystical experiences from psychosis have an imbalance in sources: the phenomenology of psychopathology is based on empirical studies while the phenomenology of mystical experiences is based on religious ideals or older textual sources.
“One issue with all three of these articles is the imbalance in their sources of information about psychosis compared to mystical experience.”
From Progress or Pathology? Differential Diagnosis and Intervention Criteria for Meditation-Related Challenges: Perspectives From Buddhist Meditation Teachers and Practitioners (2020) · cites this paper as Parnas and Henriksen (2016)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 120 · Cited by 132
- Authors
- Parnas, J., & Henriksen, M. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Henriksen, Mads Gram
- Venue
- Consciousness and Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 43
- Pages
- 75-88
- ISSN
- 1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2415586101
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 120
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 27.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Carlsberg Foundation (2012010195)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
- Keywords
- mysticism, schizophrenia, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, union with God, structure of consciousness, self-effacement, revelation, self-disorder, psychotic experiences, phenomenology of psychosis
- MeSH terms
- Consciousness, Humans, Mysticism, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review