Cited by 29Reproductive Health and ContraceptionGlobal Maternal and Child HealthInternational Human Rights and Reproductive Law

Scaling up postabortion contraceptive service — results from a study conducted among women having unwanted pregnancies in urban and rural Tanzania

Rasch, Vibeke, Yambesi, Fortunata, Kipingili, Rose·2005·Contraception

Abstract

Introduction It is well recognized that unwanted pregnancies and unsafe abortion are significant public health problems in sub-Saharan Africa. At the International Conference on Population and Development held in Cairo in 1994, postabortion care was prioritized as a means to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality associated with unsafe abortion. However, only a few postabortion care programs have been implemented and most of them have been confined to urban settings. The present study describes the magnitude of the problem of unwanted pregnancies among women with incomplete abortion in urban and rural Tanzania and evaluates the outcome of a postabortion care intervention. Methods Data were collected among 781 women admitted with incomplete abortion in Dar es Salaam region (urban Tanzania) and 575 women in Kagera region (rural Tanzania). Results Sixty-seven percent of the women in urban Tanzania and 42% in rural Tanzania stated that their pregnancy was unwanted. Contraceptive acceptance among women with unwanted pregnancies was high; 93% in urban Tanzania and 71% in rural Tanzania left with a contraceptive method. Conclusion The high proportion of women with unwanted pregnancies in urban and rural Tanzania underlines the need of scaling up postabortion contraceptive service.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.04.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Postabortion care programs have been demonstrated with success in Bolivia, Mexico, Guatemala and Tanzania.

    “Meanwhile, postabortion care programs should be scaled up, as has been demonstrated with success in Bolivia, Mexico (51), Guatemala (50) and Tanzania (63,64).”

    From Unsafe abortion and postabortion care - an overview (2011) · cites this paper as [63]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rasch, V., Yambesi, F., & Kipingili, R.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Rasch, Vibeke
Venue
Contraception
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
377-382
ISSN
0010-7824 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096658969
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Contraception (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Medical Research
  • Danish International Development Agency
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
Keywords
post-abortion care, unwanted pregnancy, incomplete abortion, unsafe abortion, contraceptive acceptability, urban-rural differences, scaling up health services, Tanzania
MeSH terms
Abortion, Criminal, Abortion, Illegal, Adolescent, Adult, Contraception, Family Planning Services, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Unwanted, Rural Population, Tanzania, Urban Population, Marital Status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review