Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 47Sex work and related issuesReproductive Health and ContraceptionAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Falling through the cracks: contraceptive needs of female sex workers in Cambodia and Laos,

Morineau, Guy, Neilsen, Graham, Heng, Sopheab, Phimpachan, Chansy, Mustikawati, Dyah E.·2011·Contraception
DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.11.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Condom is the only method promoted for dual protection among female sex workers (FSWs) in most Asian countries, which may be insufficient to prevent pregnancies given FSWs' high frequency of sexual intercourse.Study design Data were obtained from independent cross-sectional surveillance surveys conducted in Cambodia and Laos. Random samples of FSWs provided behavioral information.Results Respondents numbered 592 in Cambodia and 1421 in Laos. In Cambodia, 28.2% had abortions in the past year despite reporting 99.0% condom use at last commercial sex. Abortion increased with the number of clients, inconsistent condom use, recent condom breakage and recent forced unprotected sex with clients. In Laos, 26.0% of all FSWs had ever aborted as had 89.4% of those who had been pregnant in the past 6 months.Conclusions FSWs experience higher frequency of abortion than women from the general population. FSWs' reportedly high rate of condom use is insufficient to prevent pregnancies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.11.003

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mukenge-Tshibaka, 2005, Incorrect condom use and frequent breakage among female sex workers and their clients, Int J STD AIDS, 16, 345

Cited by

See all 47

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Morineau, G., Neilsen, G., Heng, S., Phimpachan, C., & Mustikawati, D. E.
Affiliations
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia (ID)
Corresponding author
Morineau, Guy
ORCID
Venue
Contraception
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
84
Issue
2
Pages
194-198
ISSN
0010-7824 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.contraception.2010.11.003
OpenAlex
W2144319914
Cited by
47
References
28
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Contraception (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sex work and related issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
female sex workers, contraceptive needs, abortion, condom use, contraception, prostitution, unprotected sex, forced sex, sexual partners, Cambodia, Laos
MeSH terms
Abortion, Induced, Adolescent, Adult, Cambodia, Contraception Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Laos, Pregnancy, Sex Work, Condoms, Pregnancy Rate, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review