Clinical diagnosis of completeness of medical abortion by nurses: a reliability study in Mozambique
Abstract
Background The provision of medical abortion continues to rely on routine use of ultrasound to confirm expulsion of pregnancy. However, the absence of ultrasound in most of the health facilities in developing countries and the additional training required to enable providers to use ultrasound is often prohibitive. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical history and physical examination with ultrasound in confirming completion of abortion. Study design A total of 718 women consented for medical abortion with misoprostol and were assessed for pregnancy expulsion by nurses and gynecologists. Nurses used history and physical examination while gynecologists used ultrasound to establish their diagnoses. Results Nurses' clinical diagnoses for complete abortion, incomplete abortion and ongoing pregnancy were 83% (SE 0.01), 15% (SE 0.01) and 2% (SE 0.01), respectively. When gynecologists used ultrasound, the diagnoses for complete abortion, incomplete abortion, an ongoing pregnancy were 80% (SE 0.01), 17% (SE 0.01) and 3% (SE 0.01), respectively. Overall, nurses agreed with gynecologist diagnoses in 84% of cases, with a κ coefficient of 0.49 (SE 0.06) and chance-corrected first-order agreement (AC(1)) of 0.81 (SE 0.02). Agreement was very high for the diagnosis of complete abortion (AC(1) 0.89; SE 0.02), while it was moderate for ongoing pregnancy (AC(1) 0.58; SE 0.22) and incomplete abortion (AC(1) 0.45; SE 0.08). Conclusions Clinical history and physical examination alone,…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most recent studies on abortion in Mozambique were based on hospital data and were likely to miss a substantial proportion of illegally induced abortions taking place outside health facilities.
“Because most of these studies were based on hospital data they were more likely to miss out a substantial proportion of illegally induced abortions taking place outside the health facilities.”
From Induced abortion: a cross-sectional study on knowledge of and attitudes toward the new abortion law in Maputo and Quelimane cities, Mozambique (2020) · cites this paper as [15]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Frederico, M., Arnaldo, C., Decat, P., Juga, A., Kemigisha, E., Degomme, O., & Michielsen, K. (2020) · BMC Women's Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-020-00988-6 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gebreselassie, H., Ustá, M., Andersen, K. L., & Mitchell, E. M. H.
- Affiliations
- Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ)
- Ipas (US)
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Andersen, Kathryn L.
- Venue
- Contraception
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-78
- ISSN
- 0010-7824 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057506198
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Contraception (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Keywords
- abortion pills, misoprostol, nurses, diagnosis, physical examination, history and physical examination, ultrasound, ongoing pregnancy, incomplete abortion, diagnostic agreement, Mozambique
- MeSH terms
- Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal, Abortion, Induced, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Mozambique, Nurses, Physicians, Pregnancy, Reproducibility of Results, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Misoprostol, Treatment Outcome, Treatment Failure, Young Adult, Gynecological Examination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review