Cited by 199Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBiofuel production and bioconversionAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Trash to treasure: production of biofuels and commodity chemicals via syngas fermenting microorganisms

Open access
Latif, Haythem, Zeidan, Ahmad A, Nielsen, Alex T, Zengler, Karsten·2014·Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Abstract

Fermentation of syngas is a means through which unutilized organic waste streams can be converted biologically into biofuels and commodity chemicals. Despite recent advances, several issues remain which limit implementation of industrial-scale syngas fermentation processes. At the cellular level, the energy conservation mechanism of syngas fermenting microorganisms has not yet been entirely elucidated. Furthermore, there was a lack of genetic tools to study and ultimately enhance their metabolic capabilities. Recently, substantial progress has been made in understanding the intricate energy conservation mechanisms of these microorganisms. Given the complex relationship between energy conservation and metabolism, strain design greatly benefits from systems-level approaches. Numerous genetic manipulation tools have also been developed, paving the way for the use of metabolic engineering and systems biology approaches. Rational strain designs can now be deployed resulting in desirable phenotypic traits for large-scale production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.12.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 199

Authors
Latif, H., Zeidan, A. A., Nielsen, A. T., & Zengler, K.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Novo Nordisk Foundation (DK)
Venue
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
27
Pages
79-87
ISSN
0958-1669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126579076
Cited by
199
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 12
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden
  • National Science Foundation (DGE1144086)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
syngas fermentation, biofuels, commodity chemicals, organic waste valorization, metabolic engineering, systems biology, strain design
MeSH terms
Acetates, Conservation of Energy Resources, Fermentation, Bioreactors, Systems Biology, Biofuels, Metabolic Engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review