Cited by 157Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionGene Regulatory Network AnalysisBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Next-generation genome-scale models for metabolic engineering

King, Zachary A, Lloyd, Colton J, Feist, Adam M, Palsson, Bernhard O·2015·Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Abstract

Constraint-based reconstruction and analysis (COBRA) methods have become widely used tools for metabolic engineering in both academic and industrial laboratories. By employing a genome-scale in silico representation of the metabolic network of a host organism, COBRA methods can be used to predict optimal genetic modifications that improve the rate and yield of chemical production. A new generation of COBRA models and methods is now being developed--encompassing many biological processes and simulation strategies-and next-generation models enable new types of predictions. Here, three key examples of applying COBRA methods to strain optimization are presented and discussed. Then, an outlook is provided on the next generation of COBRA models and the new types of predictions they will enable for systems metabolic engineering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.12.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 157

Authors
King, Z. A., Lloyd, C. J., Feist, A. M., & Palsson, B. O.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Novo Nordisk Foundation (DK)
Venue
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
35
Pages
23-29
ISSN
0958-1669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084769889
Cited by
157
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 18
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DGE-1144086)
  • Novo Nordisk Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
genome-scale metabolic models, metabolic engineering, strain optimization, metabolic network simulation, systems metabolic engineering
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Biological, Genome, Gene Deletion, Biomass, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Metabolic Engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review