The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Commercial feasibility of lignocellulose biodegradation: possibilities and challenges
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
MOSIER, N. (2005) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025 · Cited by 6,251
Ethanol for a Sustainable Energy Future
Goldemberg, J. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1137013 · Cited by 1,423
Cited by
Ligninolytic enzymes and its mechanisms for degradation of lignocellulosic waste in environment
Kumar, A., & Chandra, R. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03170 · Cited by 648
Wei, H., Wang, L., Hassan, M., & Xie, B. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.050 · Cited by 455
The current and emerging sources of technical lignins and their applications
Li, T., & Takkellapati, S. (2018) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1913 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Taha, M., Foda, M., Shahsavari, E., Aburto-Medina, A., Adetutu, E., & Ball, A.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 38
- Pages
- 190-197
- ISSN
- 0958-1669 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2309175144
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Commercial feasibility of lignocellulose biodegradation: possibilities and challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.012
- The paper
- Taha, M., Foda, M., Shahsavari, E., Aburto-Medina, A., Adetutu, E., & Ball, A. (2016). Commercial feasibility of lignocellulose biodegradation: possibilities and challenges. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
