Cited by 35Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Plant genome-scale reconstruction: from single cell to multi-tissue modelling and omics analyses

Gomes de Oliveira Dal’Molin, Cristiana, Nielsen, Lars Keld·2018·Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Abstract

In this review, we present the latest developments in plant systems biology with particular emphasis on plant genome-scale reconstructions and multi-omics analyses. Understanding multicellular metabolism is far from trivial and 'omics' data are difficult to interpret in the absence of a systems framework. 'Omics' data appropriately integrated with genome-scale reconstructions and modelling facilitates our understanding of how individual components interact and influence overall cell, tissue or organisms function. Here we present examples of how plant metabolic reconstructions and modelling are used as a systems-based framework for improving our understanding of the plant metabolic processes in single cells and multiple tissues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.07.009

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Flux balance analysis is readily scaled to incorporate the entire metabolic system of a cell.

    “In contrast, a second modeling approach, flux balance analysis (FBA), is readily scaled to incorporate the entire metabolic system of a cell (Sweetlove and Ratcliffe, 2011; Shi and Schwender, 2016; Gomes de Oliveira Dal’Molin and Nielsen, 2018).”

    From Leaf Energy Balance Requires Mitochondrial Respiration and Export of Chloroplast NADPH in the Light (2019) · cites this paper as Gomes de Oliveira Dal’Molin and Nielsen, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gomes de Oliveira Dal’Molin, C., & Nielsen, L. K.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Nielsen, Lars Keld
Venue
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
49
Pages
42-48
ISSN
0958-1669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2743271525
Cited by
35
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council
  • Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
plant systems biology, multi-omics integration, plant metabolism, metabolic network reconstruction, plant metabolic engineering
MeSH terms
Models, Biological, Plants, Genome, Plant, Genomics, Systems Biology, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review