Cited by 26Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchFood Supply Chain Traceability

Upcycling in the context of biotechnology-based solutions for food quality, loss, and consumer perception

Sharma, Chetan, Deutsch, Jonathan M·2023·Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Abstract

Wasted food is the single biggest contributor to greenhouse gases. Globally, attempts are being made to both reduce surplus food and divert it into food-to-food operations. This opinion piece covers upcycling and biotechnology-mediated solutions on a technology continuum as a part of the bigger whole to solve this problem. Upcycling is an approach to divert foods that would otherwise be wasted into higher uses that would also have tangible benefits to the environment and society. Likewise, biotechnology can help farmers produce crops with longer shelf life and that satisfy cosmetic standards. Uncertainty, either in the form of food safety, technology, or neophobia in the case of upcycled foods or genes (cisgenic or transgenic) in the case of biotechnology, is a hurdle. Communication and consumer perception should be researched. Both upcycling and biotechnology can provide practical solutions, but their acceptance depends on communication strategies and consumer perception.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copbio.2023.102920

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 71 · Cited by 26

Authors
Sharma, C., & Deutsch, J. M.
Affiliations
Drexel University (US)
Corresponding author
Deutsch, Jonathan M
Venue
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
81
Pages
102920
ISSN
0958-1669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4361285111
Cited by
26
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Supply Chain Traceability
Keywords
food waste upcycling, food waste, agricultural biotechnology, shelf life extension, food quality, consumer perception, genetically modified crops, food safety, neophobia, greenhouse gas emissions, communication strategies, technology acceptance
MeSH terms
Biotechnology, Perception, Crops, Agricultural, Plants, Genetically Modified, Food Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review