Cited by 543PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerMetabolism, Diabetes, and CancerAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies

Targeting the PI3K–AKT–mTOR pathway: progress, pitfalls, and promises

Yap, Timothy A, Garrett, Michelle D, Walton, Mike I, Raynaud, Florence, de Bono, Johann S, Workman, Paul·2008·Current Opinion in Pharmacology

Abstract

The strategy of 'drugging the cancer kinome' has led to the successful development and regulatory approval of several novel molecular targeted agents. The spotlight is now shifting to the phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway as a key potential target. This review details the role of the pathway in oncogenesis and the rationale for inhibiting its vital components. The focus will be on the progress made in the development of novel therapies for cancer treatment, with emphasis placed on agents that have entered clinical development. Strategies involving horizontal and vertical blockade of the pathway, as well as the use of biomarkers to select appropriate patients and to provide proof of target modulation will also be highlighted. Finally, we discuss the issues and limitations involved with targeting the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, and predict what the future may hold for these novel anticancer therapeutics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.coph.2008.08.004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Efforts shifted to target signaling components downstream of Ras such as Raf-MEK-ERK and PI3K-AKT-mTOR.

    “efforts shifted to target signaling components downstream of Ras such as Raf-MEK-ERK mitogen-activated protein kinases4 and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase-AKT-mTOR pathway5.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yap, T. A., Garrett, M. D., Walton, M. I., Raynaud, F., de Bono, J. S., & Workman, P.
Affiliations
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
Corresponding author
Workman, Paul
Venue
Current Opinion in Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
393-412
ISSN
1471-4892 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087012714
Cited by
543
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 45
FWCI
17.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Research UK (C1178/A7851, C309/A8274)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Keywords
PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, PI3K inhibitors, AKT inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, carcinogenesis, targeted cancer therapy, biomarkers, patient selection, drug resistance, anticancer agents
MeSH terms
Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Enzyme Inhibitors, Humans, Neoplasms, Protein Kinases, Signal Transduction, Biomarkers, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review