Are executive skills primarily mediated by the prefrontal cortex in childhood? Examination of focal brain lesions in childhood
Abstract
Introduction Based on the study of adults with brain insult, traditional localizationist views have argued that executive skills are primarily mediated by prefrontal cortex. It remains unclear whether a similar pattern of localization exists in childhood.Methods To investigate this hypothesis, we compared the performance of children, aged 7-16 years, with radiological evidence of brain pathology. The sample was divided according to lesion location as follows: frontal pathology (n=38), extra-frontal pathology (n=20), generalized pathology (n=21) and healthy controls (n=40). Using a multidimensional model of executive function described by Anderson (2002) and Anderson (1998; Anderson et al., 2001c, 2001d), these groups were compared on a range of executive function domains including: attentional control, goal setting, cognitive flexibility, and information processing. Additional, non-executive measures were also administered.Results Contrary to adult lesion-based studies, there was little differentiation in executive processes between frontal and extra-frontal groups.Conclusions These results provide support for contemporary models which propose a distributed, but integrated neural network for executive skills, suggesting that the integrity of the entire brain is necessary for adequate executive functions in childhood. Further, focal lesions to any brain region during development may render children vulnerable to a range of executive deficits that would not normally be expected following similar pathology in adulthood.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adolescents with frontal lesions and those with extra-frontal lesions show little differentiation on a range of executive functions, suggesting that adolescents use more distributed brain networks for executive skills than adults.
“On a range of EFs including attentional control, goal setting, and cognitive flexibility, little differentiation was observed between adolescents (age 7–16) with frontal lesions and those with extra-frontal lesions, suggesting that adolescents utilize more distributed brain networks for executive skills than adults (49).”
From Brain Mechanisms Supporting Flexible Cognition and Behavior in Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 89 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Jacobs, R., Harvey, A. S., & Anderson, V.
- Affiliations
- Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Jacobs, Rani
- Venue
- Cortex
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 808-824
- ISSN
- 0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982232489
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 3.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cortex (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- executive function, prefrontal cortex, childhood, focal brain lesions, frontal lobe pathology, distributed neural networks, attentional control, goal setting, cognitive flexibility, information processing, brain development, executive deficits
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Attention, Child, Cognition, Critical Period, Psychological, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Prefrontal Cortex, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review