Bilingualism as a contributor to cognitive reserve: Evidence from brain atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease
Abstract
Much of the research on delaying the onset of symptoms of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has focused on pharmacotherapy, but environmental factors have also been acknowledged to play a significant role. Bilingualism may be one factor contributing to 'cognitive reserve' (CR) and therefore to a delay in symptom onset. If bilingualism is protective, then the brains of bilinguals should show greater atrophy in relevant areas, since their enhanced CR enables them to function at a higher level than would be predicted from their level of disease. We analyzed a number of linear measurements of brain atrophy from the computed tomography (CT) scans of monolingual and bilingual patients diagnosed with probable AD who were matched on level of cognitive performance and years of education. Bilingual patients with AD exhibited substantially greater amounts of brain atrophy than monolingual patients in areas traditionally used to distinguish AD patients from healthy controls, specifically, the radial width of the temporal horn and the temporal horn ratio. Other measures of brain atrophy were comparable for the two groups. Bilingualism appears to contribute to increased CR, thereby delaying the onset of AD and requiring the presence of greater amounts of neuropathology before the disease is manifest.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A replication in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease confirmed that bilinguals are diagnosed later than monolinguals.
“A replication from a new set of patients all diagnosed with probable Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [125] confirmed the results.”
From Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain (2012) · cites this paper as [125]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 363
- Authors
- Schweizer, T. A., Ware, J., Fischer, C. E., Craik, F. I. M., & Bialystok, E.
- Affiliations
- St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- York University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Schweizer, Tom A.
- Venue
- Cortex
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 991-996
- ISSN
- 0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967254294
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 13.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cortex (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Alzheimer Society of Canada
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- bilingualism, cognitive reserve, Alzheimer's disease, brain atrophy, temporal horn, monolingual vs bilingual comparison, environmental risk factors, symptom onset delay, neuropathology
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Atrophy, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Multilingualism, Cognitive Reserve
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review