Cited by 20Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesParanormal Experiences and BeliefsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Stimulating the aberrant brain: Evidence for increased cortical hyperexcitability from a transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) study of individuals predisposed to anomalous perceptions

Open access
Braithwaite, Jason J., Mevorach, Carmel, Takahashi, Chie·2015·Cortex

Abstract

Findings from neurological and clinical groups have shown that increased predisposition to anomalous experience/aura reflects an elevation in aberrant neural processes in the brain. However, studies of anomalous experiences in non-clinical/non-neurological groups are less clear on this matter and are more typically confined to subjective questionnaire measures alone. The current investigation, the first to our knowledge, carried out a transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) study of cortical hyperexcitability, and its association with anomalous experience in non-clinical/non-neurological groups. Sixty participants completed; (i) both excitatory (anodal) and inhibitory (cathodal) brain stimulation conditions of the visual cortex; (ii) a computerised pattern-glare task, where observers reported phantom visual distortions from viewing highly irritable visual patterns (a metric of cortical hyperexcitability), and; (iii) questionnaire measures of predisposition to anomalous perceptions. There were no reliable signs of cortical hyperexcitability (via pattern-glare tasks) when collapsed across the whole sample. However, a significant positive correlation between predisposition to anomalous experience and elevated signs of cortical hyperexcitability was observed. Crucially, there was a significant negative correlation between tDCS stimulatory conditions. A visual cortex that reacted more strongly to excitatory stimulation, responded less well to inhibitory suppression, and this pattern was related to predisposition to anomalous perceptions. Both findings are consistent with the presence of a hyperexcitable cortex. Collectively the present findings provide objective evidence that the brains of individuals predisposed to anomalous experiences/hallucinations can be hyperexcitable - even in the non-clinical/non-neurological population. These data are consistent with continuum models of anomalous experience and have important implications for contemporary theories of aberrations in self-consciousness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.023

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study reported a correlation between predisposition to anomalous experiences/hallucinations (CAPS) and the number of visual distortions from viewing aversive gratings during active and sham tDCS.

    “Interestingly, using tDCS, a recent study also investigated the excitability of the occipital cortex in healthy subjects, and reported a correlation between the predisposition to anomalous experiences/hallucinations score measured by the Cardiff Anomalous Perceptions Scale (CAPS) 85 and the number of visual distortions that occurred from viewing aversive gratings during active and sham tDCS.86”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 93 · Cited by 20

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wilkins A. J. (1995). Visual Stress . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Authors
Braithwaite, J. J., Mevorach, C., & Takahashi, C.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Braithwaite, Jason J.
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
69
Pages
1-13
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2320803047
Cited by
20
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2012-500)
  • Bial Foundation (21/12)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
cortical hyperexcitability, anomalous perception, transcranial direct current stimulation, visual cortex, visual hallucinations, self-consciousness, anodal and cathodal stimulation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Perceptual Disorders, Young Adult, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review