Visual working memory performance in aphantasia
Open accessAbstract
Aphantasia, i.e., the congenital inability to experience voluntary mental imagery, offers a new model for studying the functional role of mental imagery in (visual) cognition. However, until now, there have been no studies investigating whether aphantasia can be linked to specific impairments in cognitive functioning. Here, we assess visual working memory performance in an aphantasic individual. We find that she performs significantly worse than controls on the most difficult (i.e., requiring the highest degree of precision) visual working memory trials. Surprisingly, her performance on a task designed to involve mental imagery did not differ from controls', although she lacked metacognitive insight into her performance. Together, these results indicate that although a lack of mental imagery can be compensated for under some conditions, mental imagery has a functional role in other areas of visual cognition, one of which is high-precision working memory.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
On standard experimental measures of memory, people with aphantasia perform normally or show at most mild to moderate impairment.
“On a range of standard experimental measures of memory (short- and long-term, verbal and visual), people with aphantasia perform normally or show, at most, mild to moderate impairment”
From Aphantasia and hyperphantasia: exploring imagery vividness extremes (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
The Results (§3.3–3.4; page unavailable) report generally unimpaired working memory in one aphantasic individual, alongside worse performance on the most difficult visual working-memory trials. The paper includes verbal and visual working-memory measures, but it does not test long-term memory or establish this pattern for people with aphantasia generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 198
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Albers, A. M., Kok, P., Toni, I., Dijkerman, H. C., & De Lange, F. P. (2013). Shared representations for working memory and mental imagery in early visual cortex. Current Biology, 23(15), 1427e1431.
- Baddeley, A. D., & Andrade, J. (2000). Working memory and the vividness of imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(1), 126e145.
- Bergmann, J., Genc ¸, E., Kohler, A., Singer, W., & Pearson, J. (2016a). Neural anatomy of primary visual cortex limits visual working memory. Cerebral Cortex, 26(1), 43e50.
- Bergmann, J., Genc ¸, E., Kohler, A., Singer, W., & Pearson, J. (2016b). Smaller primary visual cortex is associated with stronger, but less precise mental imagery. Cerebral Cortex, 26(9), 3838e3850.
- Block, N. (1983). Mental pictures and cognitive science. Philosophical Review, 92(4), 499.
- Borst, G., Ganis, G., Thompson, W. L., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2012). Representations in mental imagery and working memory: Evidence from different types of visual masks. Memory & Cognition, 40(2), 204e217.
- Borst, G., Niven, E., & Logie, R. H. (2012). Visual mental image generation does not overlap with visual short-term memory: A dual-task interference study. Memory & Cognition, 40(3), 360e372.
- Crawford, J. R., & Garthwaite, P. H. (2012). Single-case research in neuropsychology: A comparison of five forms of t-test for comparing a case to controls. Cortex, 48(8), 1009e1016.
- Heuer, F., Fischman, D., & Reisberg, D. (1986). Why does vivid imagery hurt colour memory? Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 161e175.
- Keogh, R., & Pearson, J. (2011). Mental imagery and visual working memory. Plos One, 6(12).
- Keogh, R., & Pearson, J. (2014). The sensory strength of voluntary visual imagery predicts visual working memory capacity. Journal of Vision, 14(12:7), 1e13.
- Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., Yang, L.-X., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2010). A working memory test battery for MATLAB. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 571e585.
- Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390(6657), 279e281.
- Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 17e24.
- Matthews, N. L., Collins, K. P., Thakkar, K. N., & Park, S. (2014). Visuospatial imagery and working memory in schizophrenia. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 19(1), 17e35.
- Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). What the mind's eye tells the mind's brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80(1), 1e12.
- Pylyshyn, Z. (2003a). Explaining mental imagery: Now you see it, now you don't. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 108e109.
- Pylyshyn, Z. (2003b). Return of the mental image: Are there really pictures in the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences (pp. 113e118).
- Reisberg, D., Culver, L. C., Heuer, F., & Fischman, D. (1986). Visual memory: When imagery vividness makes a difference. Journal of Mental Imagery, 10(4), 51e74.
- Reisberg, D., & Leak, S. (1987). Visual imagery and memory for appearance: Does Clark Gable or George C. Scott have bushier eyebrows? Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41(4), 521e526.
- Slotnick, S. D., Thompson, W. L., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2012). Visual memory and visual mental imagery recruit common control and sensory regions of the brain. Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(1), 14e20.
- Tong, F. (2013). Imagery and visual working memory: One and the same? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(10), 489e490.
- Wheeler, M. E., & Treisman, A. M. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(1), 48e64.
- Authors
- Jacobs, C., Schwarzkopf, D. S., & Silvanto, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Westminster (GB)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Jacobs, Christianne
- Venue
- Cortex
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 105
- Pages
- 61-73
- ISSN
- 0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2767496342
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 3.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- discovery.ucl.ac.uk
- Locations
- Cortex (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Research Council (310829, 336152)
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- aphantasia, mental imagery, visual working memory, metacognition, visual cognition, cognitive compensation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cognition, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Imagination, Memory, Short-Term, Problem Solving, Task Performance and Analysis, Visual Perception, Imagery, Psychotherapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review