The role of visual imagery in face recognition and the construction of facial composites. Evidence from Aphantasia
Open accessAbstract
People with aphantasia have a markedly impaired ability to form visual images in the mind's eye. Here, by testing people with and without aphantasia, we examine the relationship between visual imagery and face processing. We show that aphantasics have weaker face recognition than people with visual imagery, using both self-report (Prosopagnosia Index) and behavioural measures (Cambridge Face Memory Test). However, aphantasics nonetheless have a fully intact ability to construct facial composites from memory (i.e., composites produced using EFIT6 by aphantasics and imagers were rated as equally accurate in terms of their resemblance to a target face). Additionally, we show that aphantasics were less able than imagers to see the resemblance between composites and a target face, suggestive of potential issues with face matching (perception). Finally, we show that holistic and featural methods of composite construction using EFIT6 produce equally accurate composites. Our results suggest that face recognition, but not face composite construction, is facilitated by the ability to represent visual properties as 'pictures in the mind'. Our findings have implications for the study of aphantasia, and also for forensic settings, where face composite systems are commonly used to aid criminal investigations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both studies using the Cambridge face memory test detected an impairment in face recognition among people with aphantasia.
“Both detected an impairment in face recognition among people with aphantasia.”
From Aphantasia and hyperphantasia: exploring imagery vividness extremes (2024) · cites this paper as [63]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 79 · Cited by 40
- Authors
- Dance, C. J., Hole, G., & Simner, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dance, Carla J.
- Venue
- Cortex
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-10
- Volume
- 167
- Pages
- 318-334
- ISSN
- 0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4385075969
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 5.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cortex (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Leverhulme Trust
- University of Sussex
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Keywords
- aphantasia, visual imagery, face recognition (cognition), facial composites, face memory, holistic processing, featural processing, face matching, prosopagnosia
- MeSH terms
- Facial Recognition, Humans, Visual Perception, Imagery, Psychotherapy, Prosopagnosia, Recognition, Psychology, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review