The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of end user security behaviors
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder
YOUNG, K. S. (1998) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237 · Cited by 5,513
Cited by
Ifinedo, P. (2012) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2011.10.007 · Cited by 854
Employees' Behavior towards IS Security Policy Compliance
Pahnila, S., Siponen, M., & Mahmood, A. (2007) · 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2007.206 · Cited by 429
A framework and assessment instrument for information security culture
Da Veiga, A., & Eloff, J. H. P. (2010) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2009.09.002 · Cited by 396
Cyber hygiene: The concept, its measure, and its initial tests
Vishwanath, A., Neo, L. S., Goh, P., Lee, S., Khader, M., Ong, G., & Chin, J. (2020) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2019.113160 · Cited by 115
Yan, Z., Robertson, T., Yan, R., Park, S. Y., Bordoff, S., Chen, Q., & Sprissler, E. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.019 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Stanton, J. M., Stam, K. R., Mastrangelo, P., & Jolton, J.
- Venue
- Computers & Security
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 124-133
- ISSN
- 0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048584594
- Cited by
- 665
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of end user security behaviors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cose.2004.07.001
- The paper
- Stanton, J. M., Stam, K. R., Mastrangelo, P., & Jolton, J. (2005). Analysis of end user security behaviors. Computers & Security. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2004.07.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
