Cited by 47Topic ModelingInformation and Cyber SecuritySemantic Web and Ontologies

KnowCTI: Knowledge-based cyber threat intelligence entity and relation extraction

Open access
Wang, Gaosheng, Liu, Peipei, Huang, Jintao, Bin, Haoyu, Wang, Xi, Zhu, Hongsong·2024·Computers & Security

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cose.2024.103824

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, G., Liu, P., Huang, J., Bin, H., Wang, X., & Zhu, H.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Xi
Venue
Computers & Security
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
141
Pages
103824
ISSN
0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393253320
Cited by
47
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 3
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers & Security (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61931019)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
Keywords
cyber threat intelligence, named entity recognition, relation extraction, knowledge base, knowledge embedding, graph attention networks, attention mechanism, gate mechanism, cybersecurity knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review