The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decomposition into low-rank plus additive matrices for background/foreground separation: A review for a comparative evaluation with a large-scale dataset
Open accessAbstract
Background/foreground separation is the first step in video surveillance system to detect moving objects. Recent research on problem formulations based on decomposition into low-rank plus sparse matrices shows a suitable framework to separate moving objects from the background. The most representative problem formulation is the Robust Principal Component Analysis (RPCA) solved via Principal Component Pursuit (PCP) which decomposes a data matrix into a low-rank matrix and a sparse matrix. However, similar robust implicit or explicit decompositions can be made in the following problem formulations: Robust Non-negative Matrix Factorization (RNMF), Robust Matrix Completion (RMC), Robust Subspace Recovery (RSR), Robust Subspace Tracking (RST) and Robust Low-Rank Minimization (RLRM). The main goal of these similar problem formulations is to obtain explicitly or implicitly a decomposition into low-rank matrix plus additive matrices. These formulation problems differ from the implicit or explicit decomposition, the loss function, the optimization problem and the solvers. As the problem formulation can be NP-hard in its original formulation, and it can be convex or not following the constraints and the loss functions used, the key challenges concern the design of efficient relaxed models and solvers which have to be with iterations as few as possible, and as efficient as possible. In the application of background/foreground separation, constraints inherent to the specificities of the background and the foreground as the temporal and spatial properties need to be taken into account in the design of the problem formulation. Practically, the background sequence is then modeled by a low-rank subspace that can gradually change over time, while the moving foreground objects constitute the correlated sparse outliers. Although, many efforts have been made to develop methods for the decomposition into low-rank plus additive matrices that perform visually well in foreground detection with reducing their computational cost, no algorithm today seems to emerge and to be able to simultaneously address all the key challenges that accompany real-world videos. This is due, in part, to the absence of a rigorous quantitative evaluation with synthetic and realistic large-scale dataset with accurate ground truth providing a balanced coverage of the range of challenges present in the real world. In this context, this work aims to initiate a rigorous and comprehensive review of the similar problem formulations in robust subspace learning and tracking based on decomposition into low-rank plus additive matrices for testing and ranking existing algorithms for background/foreground separation. For this, we first provide a preliminary review of the recent developments in the different problem formulations which allows us to define a unified view that we called Decomposition into Low-rank plus Additive Matrices (DLAM). Then, we examine carefully each method in each robust subspace learning/tracking frameworks with their decomposition, their loss functions, their optimization problem and their solvers. Furthermore, we investigate if incremental algorithms and real-time implementations can be achieved for background/foreground separation. Finally, experimental results on a large-scale dataset called Background Models Challenge (BMC 2012) show the comparative performance of 32 different robust subspace learning/tracking methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., & Eckstein, J. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000016 · Cited by 17,075
Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts
Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., & Zabih, R. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.969114 · Cited by 6,988
Sparse Principal Component Analysis
Zou, H., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2006) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1198/106186006x113430 · Cited by 3,152
Weighted Nuclear Norm Minimization with Application to Image Denoising
Gu, S., Zhang, L., Zuo, W., & Feng, X. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.366 · Cited by 2,316 · cited 1×
“RPCA framework was applied with success in image analysis [465] such as image denoising [118], image composition [24], image decomposition [437], image Mosaicking [222], image colorization [429], image alignment and rectification [287], multi-focus image [378] and face recognition [402].”
Method
Cited by
A survey on deep learning and its applications
Dong, S., Wang, P., & Abbas, K. (2021) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100379 · Cited by 1,544
Bouwmans, T., Javed, S., Sultana, M., & Jung, S. K. (2019) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2019.04.024 · Cited by 396
Self-citationBackground subtraction in real applications: Challenges, current models and future directions
Garcia-Garcia, B., Bouwmans, T., & Rosales Silva, A. J. (2020) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2019.100204 · Cited by 337
Self-citationZhu, J., Ge, Z., Song, Z., & Gao, F. (2018) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.09.003 · Cited by 308
A review of video surveillance systems
Elharrouss, O., Almaadeed, N., & Al-Maadeed, S. (2021) · Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation · doi:10.1016/j.jvcir.2021.103116 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouwmans, T., Sobral, A., Javed, S., Jung, S. K., & Zahzah, E.-H.
- Venue
- Computer Science Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 23
- Pages
- 1-71
- ISSN
- 1574-0137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111861511
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 29.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decomposition into low-rank plus additive matrices for background/foreground separation: A review for a comparative evaluation with a large-scale dataset. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cosrev.2016.11.001
- The paper
- Bouwmans, T., Sobral, A., Javed, S., Jung, S. K., & Zahzah, E.-H. (2017). Decomposition into low-rank plus additive matrices for background/foreground separation: A review for a comparative evaluation with a large-scale dataset. Computer Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2016.11.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.