The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HiggsBounds: Confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with exclusion bounds from LEP and the Tevatron
Open accessAbstract
HiggsBounds is a computer code that tests theoretical predictions of models with arbitrary Higgs sectors against the exclusion bounds obtained from the Higgs searches at LEP and the Tevatron. The included experimental information comprises exclusion bounds at 95% C.L. on topological cross sections. In order to determine which search topology has the highest exclusion power, the program also includes, for each topology, information from the experiments on the expected exclusion bound, which would have been observed in case of a pure background distribution. Using the predictions of the desired model provided by the user as input, HiggsBounds determines the most sensitive channel and tests whether the considered parameter point is excluded at the 95% C.L. HiggsBounds is available as a Fortran 77 and Fortran 90 code. The code can be invoked as a command line version, a subroutine version and an online version. Examples of exclusion bounds obtained with HiggsBounds are discussed for the Standard Model, for a model with a fourth generation of quarks and leptons and for the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with and without CP-violation. The experimental information on the exclusion bounds currently implemented in HiggsBounds will be updated as new results from the Higgs searches become available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3370 · Cited by 9,227
Weinberg, S. (1967) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.19.1264 · Cited by 7,451
The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter
Arkani–Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., & Dvali, G. (1998) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00466-3 · Cited by 6,563
Partial-symmetries of weak interactions
Glashow, S. L. (1961) · Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/0029-5582(61)90469-2 · Cited by 4,806
Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics
Nilles, H. P. (1984) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(84)90008-5 · Cited by 4,184
Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons
Englert, F., & Brout, R. (1964) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.321 · Cited by 4,109
Parton distributions for the LHC
Martin, A. D., Stirling, W. J., Thorne, R. S., & Watt, G. (2009) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1072-5 · Cited by 3,950
The search for supersymmetry: Probing physics beyond the standard model
Haber, H. (1985) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(85)90051-1 · Cited by 3,822
Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields
Higgs, P. W. (1964) · Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/0031-9163(64)91136-9 · Cited by 3,080
Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles
Guralnik, G. S., Hagen, C. R., & Kibble, T. W. B. (1964) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.585 · Cited by 2,847
Metadata
- Authors
- Bechtle, P., Brein, O., Heinemeyer, S., Weiglein, G., & Williams, K. E.
- Venue
- Computer Physics Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 181
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 138-167
- ISSN
- 0010-4655 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028160016
- Cited by
- 756
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 17.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HiggsBounds: Confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with exclusion bounds from LEP and the Tevatron. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.003
- The paper
- Bechtle, P., Brein, O., Heinemeyer, S., Weiglein, G., & Williams, K. E. (2010). HiggsBounds: Confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with exclusion bounds from LEP and the Tevatron. Computer Physics Communications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.