Cited by 47Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials ResearchBoron Compounds in ChemistrySynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds

Boron-nitrogen analogues of cyclo[18]carbon

Pichierri, Fabio·2020·Chemical Physics Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cplett.2019.136860

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pichierri, F.
Affiliations
Tohoku University (JP)
Corresponding author
Pichierri, Fabio
Venue
Chemical Physics Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
738
Pages
136860
ISSN
0009-2614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981002183
Cited by
47
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2020-01-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Physics Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
Graduate School of Engineering, Iwate University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Boron Compounds in Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds
Keywords
cyclo[18]carbon, molecular geometry optimization, HOMO-LUMO gap, frontier molecular orbitals, vibrational modes, kinetic stability, inorganic fullerenes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review