Cited by 34Tryptophan and brain disordersTreatment of Major DepressionStress Responses and Cortisol

Clinical phenotypes of depressed patients with evidence of inflammation and somatic symptoms

Open access
Foley, Éimear M., Parkinson, Joel T., Kappelmann, Nils, Khandaker, Golam M.·2021·Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Whether depressed patients with evidence of inflammation are more appropriate candidates for immunotherapies is being tested in several clinical trials, which are selecting patients based on elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and inflammation-related symptoms. However, studies of the clinical and phenotypic profile of depressed patients with elevated CRP are relatively scarce. We have investigated detailed clinical characteristics of 84 depressed patients, grouped as those with (CRP≥3 mg/L) and without (CRP<3 mg/L) inflammation. All patients met the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision criteria for current depressive episode and had somatic symptoms of depression. We report that depressed patients with inflammation are more likely to be older (P=0.04), have higher body mass index (P<0.01), and be on non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants (P=0.04). After adjusting for potential confounders, the inflammation group had higher depression severity (adjusted mean difference, 8.82; 95% CI, 3.91–13.72), somatic symptoms (adjusted mean difference, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.58–4.92), state anxiety (adjusted mean difference, 9.25; 95% CI, 3.82–14.67), perceived stress (adjusted mean difference, 4.58; 95% CI, 1.98–7.18), and fatigue (adjusted mean difference, 9.71; 95% CI, 3.09–6.33), but not anhedonia. The inflamed group also had poorer quality of life (adjusted mean difference, −0.18; 95% CI, −0.32–0.05). At individual depressive symptom level, the inflammation group had increased guilty feelings (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 7.28; 95% CI, 2.09–31.17), pessimism (adjusted OR, 5.38; 95% CI, 1.53–22.73), concentration difficulties (adjusted OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.32–19.02), and indecisiveness (adjusted OR, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.15–18.54). Our findings highlight the clinical features associated with inflammation in depressed patients with somatic symptoms, including poor quality of life, supporting the need for intervention targeting this group. These results could also aid patient and outcome selection in future clinical trials testing immunotherapies in depression. Replication of these findings in larger samples is required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpnec.2021.100079

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The low-grade inflammatory group also reported a poorer quality of life and an increase in guilty feelings, pessimism, concentration difficulties, and indecision.

    “They also reported a poorer quality of life and an increase in guilty feelings, pessimism, concentration difficulties, and indecision [80].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 34

Authors
Foley, É. M., Parkinson, J. T., Kappelmann, N., & Khandaker, G. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (DE)
  • Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Foley, Éimear M.
Venue
Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
8
Pages
100079
ISSN
2666-4976 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3189892967
Cited by
34
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17,213, MR/S037675/1)
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • BMA Foundation for Medical Research
  • NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  • MQ Transforming Mental Health (MQDS17/40)
  • Wellcome Trust (201486/Z/16/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
depression, inflammation, C-reactive protein, somatic symptoms, clinical phenotype, depression severity, state anxiety, perceived stress, fatigue, quality of life, guilt, pessimism, indecision, concentration difficulties, antidepressant treatment, body mass index, anhedonia, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, older adults, anxiolytics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review