Life events in bipolar disorder: Towards more specific models
Open accessAbstract
This article reviews the evidence concerning life events as a predictor of symptoms within bipolar disorder. First, key methodological issues in this area are described, and criteria used for including studies in this review are defined. Then findings that negative life events predict worse outcomes within bipolar disorder are reviewed. Beyond general studies on relapse, it is important to differentiate predictors of depression from predictors of mania. When severe negative life events occur, they appear to trigger increases in bipolar depression. Nonetheless, many depressions are unrelated to negative life events and appear to be triggered by other variables. The strongest evidence suggests that negative life events do not trigger mania, except perhaps in certain contexts. Retrospective findings for schedule-disrupting life events as a trigger for manic symptoms await further assessment within a longitudinal study. Life events involving goal attainment do appear to trigger manic symptoms. Overall, it is time to differentiate among specific types of life events, as these different forms of events point towards mechanisms linking stressors with symptom expression. These mechanisms provide clues into ways to integrate the social environment with biological vulnerability (see [Monroe, S.M., & Johnson, S.L. (1990)). the dimensions of life stress and the specificity of disorder. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 167-1694; Harris, T.O. (1991). Life stress and illness: the question of specificity. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 13, 211-219]).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study focused on major life events and chronic difficulties occurring during the year before hospitalization to limit recall bias.
“We focused on major life events and chronic difficulties occurring during the year prior to hospitalization to limit recall bias (see Paykel 1997; Johnson 2005).”
From Life stress and suicide in adolescents (2019) · cites this paper as Johnson 2005
Recall of major life events may be unreliable after one year.
“Furthermore, recall of major life events may be unreliable after one year (Johnson 2005; Paykel 1997).”
From Life stress and suicide in adolescents (2019) · cites this paper as Johnson 2005
Two factors reduce the recall bias concern: the STRAIN asks about major stressors from the past year, which can be recalled accurately, and the analyses controlled for psychiatric symptoms that might bias recall.
“These concerns are tempered by (a) the STRAIN’s focus on major stressors over the past year, which studies show can be recalled accurately (Johnson 2005; Paykel 1997) and (b) controlling for psychiatric symptoms (e.g., depression) that may bias recall.”
From Life stress and suicide in adolescents (2019) · cites this paper as Johnson 2005
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 110 · Cited by 214
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Brown GW, Harris TO. The Bedford college life events and difficulty schedule: Directory of contextual threat ratings of events. London: Bedford College, University of London; 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Day R. Schizophrenia. In: Brown GW, Harris TO, editors. Life events and illness. New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press; 1989. pp. 113–137. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson SL, Kizer A, Ruggero C, Goodnick P, Miller I. Negative and goal-attainment life events: Predicting the course of mania and depression. 2004. Manuscript under review. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson SL, Meyer B. Psychosocial predictors. In: Johnson SL, Leahy RH, editors. Psychological treatments of bipolar disorder. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson SL, Ruggero C. Cognitive, behavioral and affective responses to reward in bipolar I disorder. 2004. Manuscript in preparation. [Google Scholar]
- Ruggero CJ. Unpublished thesis. University of Miami; 2003. A laboratory study of bipolar disorder: Response to failure feedback. [Google Scholar]
- Sutton SK, Johnson SJ. Hypomanic tendencies predict lower startle magnitudes during pleasant pictures. Psychophysiology. 2002;39:S80. [Google Scholar]
- Authors
- Johnson, S. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- Corresponding author
- Johnson, Sheri L.
- ORCID
- Johnson, Sheri L.
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1008-1027
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3137243
- OpenAlex
- W2003554858
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 110
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R29MH055950)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- bipolar disorder, life events, negative life events, bipolar depression, mania, relapse, goal achievement
- MeSH terms
- Bipolar Disorder, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Change Events, Models, Psychological, Risk Factors, Social Environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review