Cited by 249Schizophrenia research and treatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHomelessness and Social Issues

Reasons for increased substance use in psychosis

Gregg, Lynsey, Barrowclough, Christine, Haddock, Gillian·2007·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Around half of all patients with schizophrenia are thought to abuse drugs or alcohol and there is good evidence to suggest that they have poorer outcomes than their non substance using counterparts. However, despite more than twenty years of research there is still no consensus on the aetiology of increased rates of substance use in people with psychosis. There is a clear need to understand the reasons for such high rates of substance use if treatments designed to help patients abstain from substance use are to be successful. This paper provides an update of the literature examining the reasons for substance use by people with psychosis, and includes a comprehensive review of the self report literature. The main theories as to why people with psychosis use substances are presented. There is evidence to suggest that cannabis may have a causal role in the development of psychopathology but not for other substances. The self report literature provides support for an 'alleviation of dysphoria' model of substance use but there is little empirical support for the self medication hypothesis, or for common factor models and bidirectional models of comorbidity. It is likely that there are multiple risk factors involved in substance use in psychosis and more work to develop and test multiple risk factor models is required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.09.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 147 · Cited by 249

Authors
Gregg, L., Barrowclough, C., & Haddock, G.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Gregg, Lynsey
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
494-510
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061865545
Cited by
249
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
substance use, psychosis, schizophrenia, cannabis use, self-medication hypothesis, comorbidities, risk factors, alcohol consumption, drug abuse
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Cannabinoids, Marijuana Abuse, Depression, Humans, Psychoses, Substance-Induced, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self Medication, Comorbidity, Causality, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review